No, I read that - it's just not substantial. If the ding already existed, my point is that the driver is overlooking it in the photo we're seeing. That is proof that it is not new damage and shouldn't be considered in this case. I get that you're trying to CYA, but it doesn't need to be to this degree of hyper-vigilance.
IzzyScissor
joined 2 years ago
verifiable evidence that the damage was pre-existing that the note leaver could somehow provide
Like a photo of the driver circling the car, unable to spot where the damage was, immediately after reading the note? Hmmmm....
Don't make me go to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy with Majorly Terrible Goblin.
It's because McDonalds only brings it back right after there's been a steep decline in the price of pork.
https://www.theawl.com/2011/11/a-conspiracy-of-hogs-the-mcrib-as-arbitrage/
"The blue line is the price of hogs in America over the last decade, and the black lines represent approximate times when McDonald’s has reintroduced the McRib, nationwide or taken it on an almost-nationwide “Farewell Tour” (McD’s has been promising to get rid of the product for years now).":
This study was done 14 years ago, but I imagine it still holds true.
Wish she would Pokemon Go to a nursing home already.
Discredits anecdotal evidence
Uses anecdotal evidence as reasoning
Still not safe.
I wrote one coded entry in a new journal, and my mom brought it to me the next day and told me to decode it for her. She "just wanted to understand what I was writing about to make sure it wasn't anything bad."
I lied about it and then didn't write anything down again. Helicopter parents are the fucking worst.
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/IKnowYourTrueName
Scroll to the bottom and expand the "Myths & Religion" section for historic examples, including the Bible.
They earned enough in this year to pay $2,000 to every US resident and still make a profit.
Time to eat the rich.
Even if there's such a thing as a program without bugs, you'd still be overlooking one crucial detail - no matter the method, the end point of cybersecurity has to interface with humans. Humans are SO much easier to hack than computers.
Let's say you get a phone call from your boss - It's their phone number and their voice, but they sound a bit panicked. "Hey, I'm just about to head into a meeting to close a major deal, but my laptop can't access the server. I need you to set up a temporary password in the next two minutes or we risk losing this deal. No, I don't remember my backup - it's written down in my desk but the meeting is at the client's office."
You'd be surprised how many people would comply, and all of that can be done by AI right now. It's all about managing risk - there's never going to be a foolproof system.
"Oh, finally Tylenol is suing over all of the false narratives about their completely safe product." re-reads headline "Wait.. Oh. Oh, we're fucked."
view more: next ›
LVL1 - FVN!
I just knew I had heard it in a song before and took me a minute to remember where.