K1nsey6

joined 2 years ago
[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Some more bullshit performative politics from Democrats?

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/25177343

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago

Fuck respect. He was as much of a war criminal as Kissinger.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 months ago

Liberals brains were fried by Bill Clinton. Starting with him they couldn't see the entire party's hard march to the right.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/28856041

With fast-growing private equity firms controlling as much as 20% of the U.S. economy with minimal disclosure requirements, business leaders must understand the implications of increasing concentration of ownership by both private equity firms and index funds and advocate for enhanced reporting standards, a Harvard Law School professor argues. At stake: market competitiveness, innovation, and economic fairness.

...

Private equity has its origins in leveraged buyouts in the 1970s and 1980s. The idea was to take companies, usually publicly listed on the stock exchange, borrow a lot of money—that’s the leverage—and buy them out. Then, they could use their control to improve the value of the company and resell it, typically 3 to 5 years later. That’s the original idea of what private equity mostly does.

What’s changed since then is that the scale of operations of private equity has grown and grown and grown—to the point that now private equity controls between 15% and 20% of the entire U.S. economy. They’re no longer buying isolated companies and flipping them back to the public markets. Instead, they buy them and sell them to mostly other private equity firms. They’ve become their own separate capital universe.

...

The private equity industry is very good at convincing Congress or regulatory officials to shape laws in a way that allows them to remain essentially dark. They don't put out public reports. They don't put out any information that the public can use to evaluate what they're doing, or even their investment performance.

It is increasingly a challenge for the legitimacy of capitalism. Capitalism depends upon some degree of transparency about how it's functioning, how workers are being treated, and how consumers are being treated.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/24043909

Under this methodology of all 193 UN Member States – an expansive model of 17 categories, or “goals,” many of them focused on the environment and equity – the U.S. ranks below Thailand, Cuba, Romania and more that are widely regarded as developing countries.

In 2022, America was 41st. Interesting to see where it will be after this term of office, which looks set to be working against many of these aims.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/24092064

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml -2 points 7 months ago

Sanctions didn't do shit while Biden continued sending unlimited weapons and money. Sanctions are performative.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml -2 points 7 months ago

They won't be concerned about those crackdowns until a Republican is doing it.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml -5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

When they lay the ground work for these things to happen, yes

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

And I'm sure there's not a single shitlib out there that knows what's going on with this.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml -1 points 10 months ago

Dems are as bad, I'm not campaigning for Trump. If I'm saying Dems are as bad as Republicans, Republicans must be pretty damn bad. That's isn't the typical endorsement of support from someone.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml -1 points 10 months ago

Young voters that are clueless of her history. And only hear the whitewashed version spewing populist rhetoric.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml -1 points 10 months ago

Nothing about the $100m spent in 2024 by AIPAC to influence US elections? AIPAC is a larger threat to the US than anything any other country could do

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml -1 points 10 months ago

They are not wrong

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They still believe that using 1950s strongarm tactics works. And crickets about AIPAC spending over $100m to influence US elections

They should focus inward on their own attempts to manipulate opinion.

view more: next ›