Kaboom

joined 10 months ago
[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 4 months ago

The rules remained the same as it has for 200 years. The president is PRESUMED immunity for OFFICIAL acts. UNOFFICIAL acts have no immunity. This means there are still two angles of attack. Firstly you can say it that even though it was official, it was still unlawful. And second, you can say it wasnt an official act at all.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -2 points 4 months ago

They never are. Hell, most of the articles about trump were anonymous sources

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 4 months ago

Id even say that her being a very-experienced politician was the problem, because people were fed up with the status quo

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 4 months ago

Okay, tell me what exactly is the difference here.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yes they are. Theyre a historical example of what happens when you bring in an overwhelming amount of immigrants

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Would say that to Native Americans?

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 4 months ago

Its not our "moral duty" to provide "refuge".

What on earth gave you that idea?

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 4 months ago

I get a lot more hate online than I do offline. Im also way more political online, so I guess thats part of it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›