Kraiden

joined 8 months ago
[–] Kraiden@kbin.run 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

oh god, I'm going to hell.

This is awful and I feel for the guy and his family...

but I can't help but laugh at "Wactor the actor"

[–] Kraiden@kbin.run 24 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Hey, don't beat yourself up about it. Who hasn't accidentally bombed a camp of displaced peoples? The important thing is to apologize and try not to ~~get caught~~ bomb the next one.

[–] Kraiden@kbin.run 32 points 5 months ago (6 children)

"Winamp, it really whips the llama's ass"

[–] Kraiden@kbin.run 26 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I did this once.

I'm about 8 years older than my brother. So when he was about 6, and I was about 14, I had this habit of holding him around the back of his neck. Kinda thumb on one side, rest of the hand on his shoulder on the other side, never hard, or choking him, but it gave me good leverage to make sure he didn't get lost and/or into mischief, particularly when we were in a shop or something.

So anyway, we're in this shop, and we're looking around, and I hear my mom yell out "Kraiden, get your brother, we're leaving." So I grab my brother, and start leading him to the exit... except he isn't coming... so I pull a bit harder and say " come on, mom says we're leaving." Still nothing, so I tug a little harder " Let's go! Mom's gonna get angry!" Nothing! So I look down.

NOT MY BROTHER!!! Some kid, on his tippie toes, with my hand around his neck, absolutely REFUSING to take a step, probably out of sheer terror! Whoops! Did not feel good. DID NOT LOOK GOOD!!!

Apologized profusely and left as quickly as I could! They still give me shit about it years later.

[–] Kraiden@kbin.run 8 points 5 months ago

I... partially agree? There's a bit of a difference between the targeted tracking a private individual does with an airtag, vs the generalized, but equally creepy tracking google/apple/others do through widespread tech. One definitely poses a greater short term risk than the other

[–] Kraiden@kbin.run 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They should take it literally, because it is meant literally!

They're not exploiting customers, they are exploiting people. Those people are NOT their customers.

Facebook is literally selling people in data form. Everything you post, everyone you interact with, everything you look at across most of the web (not just facebook.com) is all catalogued and used to create a fingerprint that is a digital representation of you, and that is their product! "Essence of /u/Melt for sale here"

Their customers are advertisers.

ETA: Link

[–] Kraiden@kbin.run 88 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (11 children)

those running Facebook groups routinely find that their content isn’t even being shown to those who choose to follow them thanks to Meta’s outright abusive approach to social media where the customer is not only wrong, but should ideally have little control over what they see.

inhales deeply YOU ARE NOT THE CUSTOMER!!! YOU ARE THE PRODUCT!!!!

It astounds me how many people STILL don't understand this

[–] Kraiden@kbin.run 52 points 6 months ago

I prefer flipping that number on it's head. 15%. They delivered 15% of what they promised and are now saying "fuck it."

It's the equivalent of writing your name on the exam, and then sitting there doodling for the rest of the time.

[–] Kraiden@kbin.run 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I've just spent the last 3 days reading this off of your rec. It's... wild. And then to follow it up by seeing this is just... too weird.

[–] Kraiden@kbin.run 5 points 6 months ago

I feel this. I'm well aware that if my partner wasn't on Facebook, we wouldn't have a social life. I HATE that fact, but that, sadly, is where people put their events. I don't think I'd join if she left, but I can't deny that I benefit from her being on the platform.

She won't leave until everybody else does, and they won't leave until everybody else does, and so nobody leaves. It's dystopian.

view more: ‹ prev next ›