Lemming6969

Maybe with a schema that allows a one time verify, and then churns your entry. If that verify occurs upon entry synchronously at the time you vote, if possible, that'd be no less safe than the paper ballot you feed into the machine.

No different than how it's recorded today. We can improve from there but it's not worse with the upside of a public ledger.

This is the exact use-case for a blockchain, a public immutable ledger where you can validate your vote, but nobody can tie it back to you.

Absolutely not

That's totally untrue. Skin will return to normal temperature from any momentary increase in seconds at most. The cooling effect does other things.

Take a cup of milk and a cup of sugar and some cinnamon and that's what these fat fucks are freaking out over.

The right of the people would be interpreted to be citizens 100% guaranteed.

You mean 4 and 6

Except learning in this context is building a probability map reinforcing the exact text of the book. Given the right prompt, no new generative concepts come out, just the verbatim book text trained on.

So it depends on the model I suppose and if the model enforces generative answers and blocks verbatim recitation.

From their perspective that's what they're doing though. The means to help their kind just involves more collateral damage and what ends up indistinguishable from targeted pain.

I see a 7/10 in there that seems the most honest.