LifeInMultipleChoice

joined 3 months ago
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (7 children)

We need to have politicians automatically suspended when they sign a bill that is found unconstitutional. The politician should only be able to be re-instated by a majority popular vote, to ensure the people still believe that representative acts in the good faith of the people.

How many times are voters going to turn up to defend these antics. Are you going to show up every other weekend to revote in Desantis? Or let him be removed from office for trampling on the rights of the people and wasting your time and taxpayer money.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

That seems likely. The question comes down to where the line should be drawn. Allow the apps the be installed and then when the data is eventually reported/found by the app owners to have them file law suits against those who are "stealing" from them, or to not allow the cracked application to be loaded in the first place, which is easily disguised as a security protocol because if an app has code in it that is not originally supposed to be there, it is very possibly a form of malware, which then can hurt the users in the long run or short run if it actually acts malicious and starts doing shit like old school viruses did on PC.

People want to say we own the device so we should be able to do whatever we want, but blatantly allowing people to install cracked apps with keyloggers onto their phones unintentionally will get them sued, and ultimately hurt how many people stay using their products.

Imagine every user and password with the site listed was suddenly just accessible by everyone. It would be a hellscape of credit card companies trying to stop accounts because you order 18 pizzas off the dominos app in Georgia, and another 13 sandwiches in the burger king app at the same time in Jersey.

We need to have the freedom to load apps we trust, but if you look at the standard user base, that's who they have to make the phones for.

Could do something like make the users agree to terms by taking the phone into developer mode that makes them non responsible somehow? Might not hold up in court when they get sued though. "All the photos I took on my phone got shared online"

I read it as the PS5, so launching November 2020 it should have come with a 4tb drive. The wording likely confused me

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That's the one drag for me about the PS5 contrllers, the battery life before recharging. The PS3 controller did great, but the PS5 ones have so many features built in they die to quick for my liking.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I haven't built a new computer in awhile, but 4tb ssd would have costed more than the console when it launched would it have not? Unless you are saying they should have shipped with a hybrid SSD/HDD setup. Not sure if read/write speeds would hold up to the frame rates needed for their games now.

If she could get 3% more in every state, it would be a landslide. She would win Florida and Texas at that rate going off 2020 numbers.

My spouse was looking into it and apparently it stems from an American citizen who did something to their own dog. So they are trying to spin some crazy citizen as being done by the people he uses to rile up the racist voters.

I think he has support from North Korea, Russia, Hungary, and Turkey possibly. He doesn't have the support of Germany, France, UK, Canada, Spain... Nevermind I don't have all night

She has that face down perfect. Spot on

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I originally was reading studies performed in Australia that the U.S. pitched money to help the studies be larger, they took place around 2012, but here is more information from 2020 where you can see that it say "An estimated 10% to 15% of heavy drinkers progress to cirrhosis after decades of heavy alcohol use."

Now cirrhosis isn't the only liver impact that can come from drinking, but my point was that a lot of our "trashing their livers" view is likely because we look down our nose at drunks. Sure they added to it but we aren't refusing heart transplants to 30 year olds because they drank Pepsi, when we know just as well added sugars/corn syrup does nothing but "trash their hearts."

https://news.va.gov/82545/genetic-risk-alcohol-related-cirrhosis-uncovered/

I'll have to find the Australian government article about the 15% being replaced later. I don't keep search history, auto-deletes

I disagree with the decrease in discussion quality. Votes inherently create echo chambers. We have low effort conversations where we all downvote someone whose opinion is different and it makes them feel whatever kind of way, and they act accordingly. Whether it be leave, lash out, or discuss. If it wasn't built in and someone wouldn't already know I would say it is a bad idea, but since it will exist, making it so people learn to be civil is probably best.

view more: ‹ prev next ›