There are two ways to see it though:
Either they know of the conversation between the VAR and the ref (which I highly doubt it) and they think it was not clear and obvious because the ref had seen it.
Or they don't know what was said and they are talking bullshit. Because if there is a red card, away from the play and it is not given, it is clear and obvious.
The rules are very clear, away from the play, hitting a player in the head is a red, there is not much room to maneuver here.
I actually don't agree with this. I think they were both kind of players that would be able to score goals even when they had a shit performance and that very much played a part into not getting subbed off even on their bad days.
On the other hand, unfortunately Bobby didn't have as much stamina as the other two and was also more injury prone, so he was subbed off more.
Basically I think it is true that Bobby was getting subbed off more than the other two, but I don't think it was mainly because of them throwing tantrums.
You know, when 2/5 panel members don't believe an intentional forearm to the head away from the play is not worthy of a red, it kind of takes away their credibility.
Would you please say why these signs are plague? I genuinely don't understand why.
He has a cheat code, doesn't he?