LwL

joined 2 years ago
[–] LwL@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

The people that listen to trump speeches and think they're anything other than batshit insane won't find anything wrong with Mein Kampf either. From the parts I've seen it's similarly incoherent, just with better grammar.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

The order thing is very debatable tbh, I generally agree that going in origin culture order is better (easier to keep consistent imo), but there are at least a lot of japanese artists that swap the name order when romanized. (And I don't think I'd care if someone swapped my name order when speaking chinese).

Missing the "Sau" (no idea if Sau Lan is one name romanized as two words or two names) feels like a product of ignorance and pretty disrespectful though, yea.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

That line in particular isn't an ideology, it's a fact. Committing murder is illegal, but if I want to, I can still murder someone. More generally, systems can be put into place to prevent behaviour, but anyone can still try to get around them.

(I'm not a full on anarchist since it doesn't seem practical but I do agree with many of the ideals.)

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

How popular is non-american football in the US? I know its been getting more popular recently, but unlike most of europe and south america, it's far from the #1 sport.

I have no doubt the canadian and mexican games (and the finals) will be sold out, but with these prices, the state of the US economy, and no sane person wanting to travel there, I wouldn't be super surprised if some games in the US weren't. After all, if you're not from NA, you can just go to the next one 4 years later and it's probably much cheaper.

Sadly it won't be the ghost stadiums it would deserve though.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Does the US not have any sort of system that makes you lose your license after too many major infractions? Though i guess with an average of about $60 maybe it's just a ton of minor ones.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

No one except the people involved can say for sure. But general game design of so many AAA games feels like checkbox ticking with no actual vision, and those games are also usually the ones that superficially pretend to be woke. Those games do also often sell pretty decently, because often the dev teams are still competent and can make something fun enough that is also safe enough.

It's the same as with movies where they just get too big to fail. And then when a movie completely misses the mark, the "anti-woke" will blame it on whatever they think is woke. The vast majority of people I've seen talk about it said that the new ghostbusters sucked, but only the "anti-woke" crowd blamed it on the main cast being women. (I don't watch enough movies, especially the bland safe blockbusters, to have an example i watched, so if this was some kind of right wing reviewbombing tell me - but most of my social media is fairly left biased so I'm assuming it was actually just kinda bad)

And it's not like they're wrong, most people will either like or not be opposed to some more diversity/some renaming of a menu option. Myself included.

And to be clear, I'm not saying that this superficial wokeness is making the games worse (or that it's a bad thing - it's a sign that the status quo is shifting a bit, and much like the overton window will help push it further). Just that the bland checkbox ticking games will almost always have these elements because it certainly won't hurt sales. So it's easy for grifters to say that's the reason, and if they like a game that has any (superficial or not) wokeness they will ignore it or make up some reason why it's ok here.

(Also to clarify since I sometimes refer to "anti-woke" perspective here so it might come off differently: I don't use the term woke as a negative)

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah, people are mad about execs forcing shitty decisions into games, and are being told it's "because woke". When in reality it's just that shitty checkmark-ticking games tend to have superficial progressive elements because some marketing surveys or the podcast the ceo heard last night said that people want a gay character.

Some (sadly kinda many) then also take that and start complaining about everything they perceive as woke even in otherwise fine games, when it doesn't affect the game quality at all. Like the oblivion remaster renaming gender to body type (or sth similar).

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I don't hate on gnome because people can use what they want but coming from windows the UX was so unintuitive i had to switch to a different session without a DE to get rid of gnome. I'm sure it's learnable and then depending on your preferences pretty great.

I also don't think plasma is messy though. To me there's nothing worse than a system hiding options out of the assumption that I don't need them (see also: windows over time, which is a big part of why I made the switch to linux in the first place).

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Well, it's about maximum profit. So if they could make more, it's insane that they wouldn't. But it might be that profit in the short term was higher by not spending as much money on R&D, and if there's one thing stock markets are great at it's incentivizing short term profit over long term viability.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The original audio after mastering is also still called a master, but I haven't seen anyone complain about that. And that (as well as the same meaning for other media) is the word that the branch name master came from, so etymology can't really be an argument there (though I also think etymology is terrible reasoning for renaming something in general).

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

There's also the possibility of having genuinely good intent, but still speaking entirely from your own conjecture of what might make others uncomfortable.

Ultimately, you should always talk to the people actually affected and take action based on that. But anyone can and should start the initiative when they think something is harmful.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I do both. When it's not something I pull from memory I'll say how I found it and also provide what I found. Which isn't about telling people that they shouldn't ask, but rather to teach them for when they can't.

I will be eternally pissed at people that don't because then I find that question on google 5 years later and they're telling me to google it which I did...

view more: next ›