Mickey7

joined 2 years ago
 
[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Wasn't there a popular song with that title?

 
 
 
 
 
 
[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (4 children)

would you do a bit of licking it before eating it?

 
 
 
 
 
[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

If I had a dirty mind I might think you were implying that I would lay my coordinates chart on her back

[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

They never seem to grasp that a remark like that can cause you to go limp immediately

[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think this is more about the length of something vs how tall you are

[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

To be fair and equal should the same be done with girls and use the term "rack size potential"

[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

research shows that the only advantage is with length and girth of the penis shaft. Testicles do not play a significant part

[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Remember the good old days when guys would shove socks into their underwear and girls would shove them into their bras?

[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 43 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Apparently some countries are now testing boys in puberty with a method of determining just how large their penis will become. They then train those with the largest hog potential on how to ski jump

[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Your comment brings up the age old question of how much of the total length is actually part of the action.

view more: next ›