Moonrise2473

joined 2 years ago
[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 2 points 6 months ago

An old android phone with a micro-hdmi port

The last phone I saw with a micro HDMI port was the blackberry Z10 in 2013

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 4 points 6 months ago

I don't want to be the asshole but 3 days of a super underpowered VM (it can be a oracle free tier for example) is a drop in the ocean compared to the $100/year/perpetuity that apple wants from devs

Main problem might be the content, as they might think that it's going to be used for piracy

Maybe try to spin it as "Kevin macleod recommendation engine" by filling it with this content https://archive.org/details/incompetech-all-the-music-2020/page/n2/mode/1up

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 5 points 6 months ago

Guys, I found one other Microsoft claim that's even more hilarious:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/windows/copilotplus-claims?tabs=amd

They say that:

  1. Windows 11 PCs are faster than the MacBook air M4 (with the top of the line AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, but only with cinebench. Because a fanless laptop like the MacBook air is perfect for run cinebench the whole day, I'm sure it won't throttle)

  2. They're also faster than the MacBook air M3 (of course, if they were faster than M4...) of course still only with cinebench

  3. And they're faster than the MacBook air M2. Of course only with cinebench. I'm sure it's only a coincidence that they are choosing a heavy benchmark for a fanless laptop instead of a MBP with better airflow. What's next, comparing the result of multicore cinebench on a MacBook air wrapped in cellophane, inside a car parked in the Texan summer?

  4. And that when running cinebench multicore, it's FIVE TIMES FASTER than what you gonna get with a windows 10 PC!!! This claim was so hilarious that I had to find that test from that "reputable" third party and in the PDF they're comparing a Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 with a ThinkPad E590 Intel Core i5-8265U. Of course the Ryzen is faster in multicore benchmark, it has 20 threads vs only 8.... I don't understand why they settled on a simple Ryzen AI 9 365. Why not comparing the 8th gen i5 U series with a threadripper pro 9995x in multicore cinebench? In this way they could claim "it's HUNDRED TIMES FASTER!!!11!"

  5. And the newest copilot+ windows 11 PCs are FOUR TIMES faster in 3D gaming (the catch: only in 3d mark and only if comparing with laptops with integrated graphics)

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 3 points 6 months ago

The difference in performance from a Intel 11th gen and Intel 12th gen, with the same amount of memory and the CPU in the same class, is not measurable in daily life. The average for w10 devices is skewed to the bottom, and it's also a comparison that doesn't make sense. Of course a computer from ten years ago is slower. I would be surprised if it wouldn't be like that.

They wanted to do a comparison like Apple "M1 is 4x faster than our previous Intel laptop" but at least apple says which exact benchmark uses and it's directly compared to the previous model on sale, not a random one from a decade ago (although Apple always chooses some useless benchmark like calculating integers or other stuff that has absolutely no impact in real life but has a higher result).

Here Microsoft says "Web browsing is up to 3.2x faster" but we all know that RAM heavily influences web browsing. How much memory the chosen sample has? They don't say it and I suspect they're comparing 4/8gb devices vs 16/32gb devices

Same for "Ms office is up to 2x times faster" but we all know that the difference is invisible in real use. Probably the w10 sample have sata HDDs (especially that i3-6100) while the w11 sample they all have nvme pcie gen 4 x4 drives so of course they load Microsoft word much faster.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Plot twist: Hitler was actually your son and become like that because of a missing fatherly figure

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 1 points 6 months ago

Ah really? I thought they did a universal client

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There's also the assembly manual?

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Never tried but ccmaker is old and not working for recent versions

And portable is probably using a cracked version of vmware thinstall behind the scenes, which is from the days of windows 7

Try with monkrus or genp

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So they forced me to migrate my pocket account to my Mozilla account, breaking login in my Kobo reader and then 6 months later they kill it? Couldn't just directly kill it?

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 2 points 7 months ago

In my country the account owner will get 2-6 years of prison for money laundering, so nobody would "lend" or rent that. Unless it's stolen identity, and then if widespread the bank will be responsible for having weak KYC procedures (for example ING bank, with a worldwide revenue of 18 trillion, was banned from getting new customers in the country for around 5 years because they allowed to open online accounts too easily)

 

I bought a Nokia Receiver 6000 for 20 euro and then i noticed that the recording and timeshifting feature is locked under a 19,90 euro DLC to download from https://streamview.com/it/Recording-Software-Receiver-6000/SW10011

This kind of stuff can be pirated or it's too niche?

 

Hi, some bot for some reason really needs to scrape my wordpress blog over and over again, overheating my poor celeron.

For laziness I am just using the default wordpress docker image, which is php+apache.

I did some experiments and with php-fpm+caddy it's much faster.

Now i want to migrate all my wordpress blogs, five in total and I want to manage them from a single caddy instance.

php-fpm needs to be mounted in the same path or it can be different?

For example, the wordpress install places the files in /var/www/html, and so for Caddy I mount in the same path and in the Caddyfile i have:

test.example.com{
        root * /var/www/html
        php_fastcgi wordpress:9000
        file_server
}

if i have multiple installs can I mount different paths like /var/www/html2 and so on (but only on caddy) or it must match both containers?

 

Imho a decision that doesn't make sense, Google already has paid for all the infrastructure so running the service to them is pure profit, not to mention the lost possibility to upsell Google workspace (paid gmail with a custom domain) or Google cloud services to all their customers.

Although I would never subscribe to something from Google for my business, then when they eventually change mind and kill my product, i have to migrate in an hurry. I've been hurted too many times

 

Finally after so many years the "never combine labels" setting is back and i can uninstall explorerpatcher

 

Because they're making Xbox Series games

(I was seriously thinking the new console was called "xbox one series S")

 

I have 49 gb of music and at the moment i just sync it between my devices with syncthing. But i think it will be better if i stream it, as the storage on my phone is limited.

Which streaming server do you recommend?

I saw nextcloud music, but i have the feeling it's half backed and it will just clog my nextcloud install. Or supysonic? Ampache?

view more: ‹ prev next ›