Half elf*
Mossheart
That was the most non-judgemental and logical answer I've seen in a while to vaccine hesitancy, nice work.
Republicans won't stay home out of fear. They're the ones with the bulk of the guns anyways and seems a large body of them are itching for a manufactured reason to use them.
'i WaS gUaRdInG tHe VoTe'
Like capitalization of 'When'? :D
Aside from that, fully support your point.
We're in the market for our first car and I feel this. First manufacturer to make a car without all this touchscreen bullshit and actual button based controls will make bank.
I just want a car, not an HP printer on fucking wheels.
Just use something like acuity and save yourself the hassle entirely? Why does it need to be self hosted?
DNS Adblock?
Well, it's not THEIR second amendment if it's not THEIR country. Plus, it's Canada anyways, we don't have such craziness as a second amendment.
In any case, this was an enjoyable watch. I wish there'd been more of his rant shown.
Most do, yes but best to have at least a passing knowledge in security practices before doing that. At the very least, ensure that whatever you get supports 2FA for user logins and has a track record of patching vulnerabilities quickly. IMO, I wouldn't trust a WD device after their massive hack that killed their service for 10 days.
Maybe check a Synology or QNAP device.
All storage media fails HDD or SSD. Focus on a backup plan, not your media type.
'There's two kinds of people in this world, those that have backups, and those who will'
Welcome to the club, and sorry for your loss.
There's lots of practices around backups with different levels of complexity and costs. Before deciding on how you want to handle things going forward ask yourself a few questions
- How important is this data? Is it irreplaceable?
- How much data do I have to backup?
- How do I want to control it? Locally? Cloud services?
- What budget do I have to do this with?
In some cases, it's cheaper and less headache to use cloud backup services for smaller amounts of data, with the downside being that you're trusting someone else with your data.
In others, setting up your own DAS(direct attached storage) or NAS (network attached storage) might make sense, then you manage the data locally. You should do some reading to understand the basic concepts of RAIDs 1,0,5 and 10 and how they affect data redundancy.
Lastly, consider if a 3-2-1 (The 3-2-1 rule states that you should have 3 copies of your data (your production data and 2 backup copies) on two different storage types with one copy off-site for disaster recovery.) back up policy makes sense for you and your risk tolerance. Some absolutists will state you have no real backup without it, but IMO there's some grey area there depending on different needs and risk tolerances.
The important part is you're now considering options to reduce your chances of experiencing this again.
I just started watching the Handmaid's Take for the first time tonight. JFC, it's supposed to be fiction, not a blueprint.