MossyFeathers

joined 1 year ago
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 9 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Nah. It's "ancient" vs "modern". "Modern" is anything well-documented or easily translated into English, "ancient" is anything that lacks documentation or has ambiguous translations. Some things I've seen ancient alien people freak out about: Stonehinge, pyramids, roman dodecahedrons, antikythera mechanism, ancient astronauts, UFOs in medieval/Renaissance art (yes, that is supposedly a thing), Nazca lines, and more.

My point is that anything even remotely weird or inexplicable with any historical ambiguity is up for grabs when it comes to ancient alien theories. At least, that's been my observation.

*shrug*

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, no it wouldn't. You're still using math, you're just using a different language. If apple bananas becomes apple pears after being hit by a bullet, you've changed the value. That is what math describes. You cannot avoid this. This is how computers work, and math is just another language to describe things. Even if every health value is a string, you still need to keep track of which string is currently in use so that you know when to kill the player. That requires math. That is what they're talking about. It is not the in-game health indicator that is public domain, it is the actual health value in RAM that is generated and modified during gameplay.

It is better this way. Copyright is already abused to hell and back, if they expanded copyright to cover this kinda stuff then it would potentially destroy things like right-to-repair as companies could claim copyright infringement on anything that modifies their code.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What this is saying is that the Minecraft world would not be under copyright, but anything the player built in that world would be. So you can't copyright the world itself, but you can copyright any human-made constructions in that world.

This is wholly preferable to the alternative options which could result in things like being able to copyright AI-generated works (applying his logic to AI, they're basically saying you can copyright any edits to an AI-gen image, but not the image itself because that was AI-gen).

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

...yes? Changing the language or the way it's presented doesn't change the math behind the scenes. That's not how computers work.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

The symbols would be copyrighted, but the actual behind-the-scenes value (i.e. 20/100, 62.5/1200, etc) isn't. That's what they're referring to.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 8 points 1 month ago (17 children)

I mean, this is a pretty normal distinction afaik (human vs non-human creations; afaik non-human creations almost always have any human copyright claims voided when challenged).

Imo what makes this special is how precise he's being. If I understand correctly, he's basically saying that the code for the health bar is a human creation and protected by copyright, but while the code to change the health value might be human-made, the actual values are machine-made and not under copyright (there's probably a lot of nuance I'm skipping over, but my understanding is that's the gist of it).

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

People who evalulate and grade pop-culture collectables like baseball cards, video games, etc.

Imagine having a career based on turning people's collection hobbies into investment opportunities for rich people; making said hobbies unaffordable for the people who actually enjoy the subject matter in the process. You'd have to be a real fucking scumbag to do something like that.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Some livestreamers (even big ones) are legitimately fun to watch, but I agree that there are a lot of livestreamers that just do "reaction content" which, while it can be fun (in the same way as Rifftrax/MST3K), isn't something most streamers put enough effort into to be considered good. Instead it ends up being a low-effort way of generating views.

If you want some good streamers, some of the big streamers I like are people like,

  • Vinesauce Vinny: Unhinged but chill New York Italian streamer who likes corrupting games (fucking with the ROM/RAM while the game is running) and laughing at unhinged 80's and 90's video game commercials; in a band with Jabroni Mike and he's also known as "binyot".
  • Jabroni Mike: Unhinged and not chill New York Italian streamer who loves dredging up YouTube content slop to laugh at; in a band with Vinny and he's also known as "Cumchugger".
  • Vargskelethor: Absolutely unhinged swedish metalhead who lives in a public toilet where he points and laughs at people while they take a shit (very childish sense of humor, but a lot of fun to watch because you never know what to expect); in a metal band called Scythelord along with a self-titled solo project. Also known as Joel, Yo-ell, Jobel, fecalfunny.com, etc.
  • Jerma985: a fucking psycho in semi-retirement; best known for his irl streams like the Dollhouse (IRL Sims with chat controlling Jerma), baseball stream (~~shoved an entire baseball up his ass, live on twitch~~ put together two fictional baseball teams for a livestreamed baseball game), carnival stream (he had chat-controlled robots to let chat play the games), ~~archeology~~ geology stream, Who Will Replace Me?, and so on.
  • Laimu/Limealicious: vtuber affiliated with Vinesauce, """wholesome""" streamer.
  • Fredrik Knudsen: Yes, the "Down the Rabbit Hole guy" also has a twitch channel.
  • WhiskeyDing0: another vtuber, this time furry as fuck, but he plays a lot of indie horror games and sometimes organizes VRChat game shows with other furry streamers; also probably the biggest furry streamer right now. Great way to find new indie horror games.
  • Jall: furry "fleshtuber" with an absolutely insane setup designed to try and recreate the feeling of watching a YouTube poop, except it's live. Warning: consume in small doses; his streams are a sensory overload like nothing else.

Even if it's not your thing, I'd highly recommend looking up the stream vods for Jerma's IRL stuff, it's brilliant and extremely high-effort.

Edit: I was just trying to make some suggestions, jeez.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, Indians and pilgrams were more acceptable; and, tbh, I still think it could possibly be considered acceptable if handled correctly, however neither kids nor their parents would likely put the effort in to do it right, so maybe it's for the better that "pilgrams and Indians" is dying out (I could also just be starting to get old and out-of-touch though, but I'm not that old; I'm trying to stay up-to-date I swear ;~;).

However, I also remember that painting your face to change your skin color for the purpose of imitating another race, regardless of your original color, was considered wrong (at least it was in my family) because it was a form of discrimination (this actually caused me a lot of confusion when I became aware of the idea that not all discrimination is equal, and that some discrimination is considered culturally acceptable if it's "punching up" or meant to even the playing field between races, cultures, sexes, etc).

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I grew up in Texas and was taught that shit like that wasn't even remotely acceptable well before 2007.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago
  • Yellow Submarine (I think a lot of people either forget this movie exists, or write it off as a kids movie. You're missing out on a movie that could be considered as revolutionary to animation as the Beatles were to music.)
  • Back to the Future
  • The Muppet Movie
  • School of Rock
  • Bladerunner
  • The Matrix

There's probably other's, but that's what immediately comes to mind.

view more: ‹ prev next ›