MrFunkEdude

joined 1 year ago
[–] MrFunkEdude@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

You can only do what you can when you can. When it's time too vote, vote. When it's time to help your community, help them. When it's time to lend your voice to the cause, then do so.

But most importantly, stay safe. Protect your loved ones. Do what's needed to keep them safe even if it means finding safety elsewhere. People have survived this kinds of political authoritarianism before. People have survived fascist regimes before. You can too.

[–] MrFunkEdude@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Thanks for the reply.

"inherently probabilistic and can't be determined" is just another way of saying "random" or "we don't know yet".

If reality was not deterministic, the reliability of models and predictions in physics would be upended.

[–] MrFunkEdude@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago (12 children)

In a deterministic reality, where all things are due and subject to causation, there can be no free will. If we did not live in a causal reality, we'd never be able to make accurate predictions or models.

"Randomness" is not free will either. If you're not in complete control of your influences, then you can not be said to have free will. Randomness does nothing to help the argument for free will.

With that said. Regardless of the existence of free will, what does exists is your awareness of what it's like to be you. To be in the circumstances that currently govern your life. And in that awareness exists the boundless capacity for compassion. Once you understand that no one is in control of their lives, that all things are causal, it allows you to be less judgmental.

"If a man is crossing a river and an empty boat collides with his own skiff, he will not become angry. He will simply guide his boat around it.

But if he sees a person in the boat, he will shout at the other to steer clear. If the shout is not heard, and the boats collide, he will curse the other person.

Yet, if the boat were empty, he would not be angry."

— Chuang Tzu (Zhuangzi)

I wrote a simple explanation of determinism in a blog post earlier this year (there's an audio version available as well.) https://mrfunkedude.wordpress.com/2024/12/03/following-the-strings/

[–] MrFunkEdude@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The fact that people in this thread are bitching at each other and calling each other names over how they approach meditation is sad. Over the last year I have practiced Transcendental Meditation, Samitha, Vipassina, and I am now working on Zazen. I practice for two hours each day. Once in the morning and once in the late afternoon.

From all of them the one thing I have taken away is an increase in empathy and compassion. By calming the mind and noticing the impermanence of thought and coming to the realization that the majority of people suffer from their thoughts which they have little control over, I was able to extend compassion and widen my capacity for empathy. So I don't understand the vitriol being tossed around by those professing to know what meditation "really is".

If someone is saying that they meditate and it's as good as drugs for them, then who am I to judge? If someone says that they meditate and it's not as good as drugs, who am I to judge? If someone says that they meditate and that it doesn't increase their capacity for empathy and compassion, again, who am I to judge?

There is a Zen saying... "Practice like a blind person in a dark room.” I encourage everyone to meditate on this informal Koan.

[–] MrFunkEdude@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've been using Mint for a year now and I just got a second laptop and the first thing I did was Wipe Windows 11 off of it and install Mint.

It does everything I need it too.

[–] MrFunkEdude@piefed.social 4 points 3 months ago

Oscar the Grouch from Sesame Street.

[–] MrFunkEdude@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago

ha! Jokes on you. I paid for the TV.

[–] MrFunkEdude@piefed.social -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Sesame Street.
We get it. Burt and Ernie are just "friends". Oscar is a "grouch" because people treat his home like trash. Big Bird in an unhomed youth forced to sleep in an alley on some twigs that he uses for a bed. It's a damn soap opera.

I mean, come on.

[–] MrFunkEdude@piefed.social 12 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Was the $100 price ever confirmed? I thought it was just rumored?

 

I follow #FediLive, #Owncast and "PeerTube" on Mastodon and have noticed a surge of new streamers on both services over the last month or so and I'm wondering if anyone else has noticed this as well?

Most of all, I'm wondering why? Was there a decrease in server costs? Have they become easier to install? Maybe it's just more people realizing that they even exists? Don't get me wrong, I'm happy to see this, I'm just curious as to why it seems to be happening in such a dense amount of time?

[–] MrFunkEdude@piefed.social 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I like your thoughts about having them look different from each other in someway to make them distinguishable. I think that might be a smart thing to do if you’re an instance owner.

I also think that we’re not really that far apart in what we’re both saying. When I read your example of the on boarding process for some people, it just reinforces what I said in my original reply, which was “ It's been my experience that people who couldn't figure out how to join Mastodon are the same people that get so used to doing things one way, that when you introduce a different way, they fall apart.” it’s not that ideas like “instances“ are difficult subjects to grasp, it’s that the person who is joining is expecting a different experience. Which I think causes part of their brain to kind of shut down a little. So things start to become confusing. I think this becomes obvious when you talk to people who had no issues joining. What they usually say is something along the lines of “I read it and caught on pretty quick.“ Which was my experience as well. Sure, once I got in it took me a few moments to realize what was what and get a grasp on @names but it was never something that made me say “this is too confusing“. It was just new. And I treated it like that.

Which makes me think that the people who say they don’t understand things like “Federation“ never really tried to understand them to begin with. As you noted, email is a handy comparison to use. When I’ve explained it to them like that, most people kind of smack their head and “get it” pretty quickly after that.

I’ve thought for a long time the first thing that someone should read when they try to join Mastodon is “This isn’t like any social media you’ve ever joined. We do things different, and if you read along, you’ll understand why.” Or something similar to get the person who is joining out of that frame of mind where they think they’re joining something that they’ve done before. I think that would put people in the right frame of mind right away.

But I’ve been known to be wrong before.

view more: next ›