MrMakabar

joined 1 year ago
[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

A lot of countries do not like China. India and China have regulare border fights that alone is massive, the EU does not like China too much either(Ukraine being a big part of that), Indonesia has just hit China with 200% on textiles, Mexico, Brazil and Chile have added anti dumping tariffs on Chinese steel, Thailand is looking into Chinese dumping as well. There also are border conflicts with the seven dash line with most nearby countries like Vietnam, Philipines, Malaysia and Indonesia.

BRICS is a group of countries, who do not like the US. That however does not mean they like China. That is why you hear the term multipolar world order a lot from those countries. As in no country should rule the world.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Migrants in America are fucked as well. Mass deportation, if they are lucky, if not they kill them.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 week ago

She has done something for the climate in the past and unlike Trump actually understands that climate change is real.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Do you prefer Vance?

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago

The EU is a massive car exporter and the car industry in Europe is not doing that great right now. That is due to European companies producing EVs in China and then bringing them into the EU. So the EU trying to force them to keep car factories open is just logical. Hence the probe and the targetted tariffs, based on the subsidies they recieve from the Chinese government.

Also, the tarrifs I’m complaining about aren’t Carbon-related, nor imposed by China(where on earth did you even get that absurd idea?), but they would stack in an awful manner.

The article you post under is literally called: "China Confronts Europe Over Climate-Based Trade Restrictions". Also I have no idea, where I wrote anything about China imposing tariffs. Just that those are not fixed, but flexible based on certain criteria.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A lot of high income countries did not have their industrial revolution less then a century ago. That was a bit post WW1, so it was mainly Western Europe besides the Iberian peninsula, US, Canada and Australia, which were industrialized a century ago. Japan did really start to grow in 1960, as did Spain and Italy. South Korea went up in the 1980s. Many already have had peak per capita emissions some time ago. Then you have problems like South Africa and Russia, which both have high emissions, but are not that rich. Russias per capita emissions are above those of the EU since 1951 for example. Time is also a problem, as in countries have falling emissions and others have increased, so that needs to be included. Also technology changed. Things like solar, wind turbines, electric cars, even electric trains, nuclear power plants and so forth are well developed technologies today. That was not the case a century ago. Besides that global climate change and knowledge of human impacts of it, are relativly recent, it only started being a somewhat discussed political point in the 70s.

Point is, that it is complex and there honestly should be a formular to determine each countries contribution and that should include new emissions. Depending on how it is calculated that can absolutly include China.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

Usually those artist did get some recognition during their life, but never got into the main stream. That changed due to the main stream changing and the people who did like the art showing it again. That is actually rather easy to do with something like the Fediverse. It just requires a download option. Especially when everybody is aware, that the content will be deleted, that would be a decent option.

Also a lot of content on social media in general is very short term. Stuff like politcal discussions are fairly useless after a few months in most cases. So that can be deleted without much care and again, if somebody wants to preserve it, they easily can just download it.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It really does not matter too much to the planet, if products consumed in the EU produce emissions in China or the EU. However the EU has well working emission trading sytem, which in the coming years, will make carbon intensive manufacturing all but impossible in the EU. That becomes useless, if companies just end up producing in China instead, using old fossil fuel based factories. So having a carbon tariff is a great option. If China indeed cares about the planet, then they can produce in a sustainable fashion and export with no carbon tariff to the EU. Also the from the EU carbon tariff is lowered by the cost of carbon in the producing country. So China can just increase their carbon price to meet the EU level.

If China goes green, then the carbon tariff is zero. If Chinas carbon price is as high or higher then the EUs, then the carbon tariff is zero.

As for cars there is the option for manufacturers to show how high Chinese subsidies are. If they do not get subsidies, then they do not have to pay tariffs. Btw the EU has a fossil fuel car phase out date in law, unlike China.

China is the biggest emitter in the world. If they do not lower their emissions, which this clearly shows they have no intresst in doing, then we are all fucked.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

China is richer then the global average and at this point about average in terms of per capita cummulative emissions. It does not need special protection anymore.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 week ago

And everybody knows that total market includes fossil fuel and arms companies. That is why there are ESG funds, which do exclude the really nasty companies. Those are pretty easy to buy and can also cover a large field of investments. She has lobbied for divestement from fossil fuels, so she should very much be aware that those options are around, while this has been pointed out for nearly a decade. So really no excuse for that.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 62 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

How the hell can the presidential candidate of the Green Party own a MILLION DOLLARS OF OIL AND GAS SHARES? How can you complain about Israel murdering children in Gaza, when you own shares in Raytheon, which sells and produces weapons for and in Israel?

 

Translation from German:

Energy consumption in Germany fell sharply in the first three months of the current year compared to the same period last year. With the exception of the continuously growing population and this year's leap day on 29 February, all influencing factors had the effect of reducing consumption. This applies to the overall subdued macroeconomic development, the mild weather conditions and the high level of energy prices, including the increased costs for CO₂ emissions as part of the national emissions trading scheme for fossil fuels.

According to preliminary calculations by the Working Group on Energy Balances (AG Energiebilanzen), domestic primary energy consumption reached 3,030 petajoules (PJ) or 103.4 million tonnes of coal equivalent (mtce) in the first quarter of 2024. This was 4.6 per cent less than in the same quarter of the previous year.

The consumption of mineral oil fell by 2.8 per cent in the first three months of the current year. While the consumption of petrol fell by around 4.4 per cent and diesel fuel even declined by almost 9 per cent, sales of aviation fuel increased by almost 11 per cent. The supply of crude petrol to the chemical industry fell by more than 4 per cent. By contrast, sales of light heating oil rose by just over 4 per cent as many consumers increased their stocks.

Natural gas consumption recorded a slight increase of 1.2 per cent in the first quarter of the current year, which is largely due to increased consumption as a result of this year's leap day. More natural gas was used in electricity generation in particular. In contrast, the mild weather caused demand for natural gas for heating purposes to fall. In industry, the use of natural gas declined against the backdrop of the production trend. In contrast, there was a slightly positive trend in the trade, commerce and services sector and in district heating generation.

Hard coal consumption fell by more than 20 per cent overall in the first three months. The use of hard coal in power plants to generate electricity fell by more than 40% as a result of an overall decline in electricity generation, increased electricity production from renewable energies and higher electricity purchases from neighbouring countries. Sales to the iron and steel industry increased by just under 4 per cent due to the rise in pig iron production.

Lignite consumption fell by almost a fifth. The decline in production (minus 17.3 per cent) largely corresponded to the development of deliveries to the public utility power plants, which purchase more than 90 per cent of domestic lignite production. Electricity generation from lignite fell by 18.5 per cent in the first quarter of the current year.

The final decommissioning of the last three nuclear power plant units (Neckarwestheim 2, Emsland and Isar 2) on 15 April 2023 means that nuclear energy will no longer contribute to the domestic energy supply.

In the first quarter of 2024, 0.5 billion kWh (1.6 PJ) more electricity was exported abroad than flowed back to Germany. In the same period of the previous year, the export surplus was 9.5 billion kWh (34.3 PJ). So far this year, more electricity has been purchased from France and Belgium than has been supplied. In addition, the export surpluses with Switzerland and Austria have decreased significantly.

The contribution of renewable energies in the first quarter of 2024 was 2.9 per cent higher overall than in the same period of the previous year. This development is due in particular to an increase in electricity production from hydropower, photovoltaics and, above all, wind energy. The use of renewable energies in heat generation declined due to weather conditions.

The clearly recognisable changes in the structure of energy consumption, in particular the further decline in the use of coal, are likely to have led to a reduction in CO₂ emissions of around 6.6% or 12 million tonnes (mt), according to estimates by AG Energiebilanzen. Decline in energy consumption primarily affects coal Development of primary energy consumption 1st quarter 2024 Changes in per cent - Total 3,030 PJ or 103.4 million tce

 
 
Source Change compared to previous year
Oil -5,1
Gas -7,2
Hard Coal -19,1
Lignite -23,4
Renewables -0,3
Nuclear -72,3
Total -9,0

Translation from German:

Energy consumption in Germany in 2023 will be shaped in particular by economic development. This year's economic output could fall by around 0.5 percent. Energy-intensive industries in particular are experiencing a decline in production, which is having a noticeable impact on energy consumption.

So far, the warmer weather compared to the previous year has had a consumption-reducing effect on the demand for space heating. According to calculations by AG Energiebilanzen, around one fifth of the total percentage reduction in consumption is likely to have been due to the weather.

A third consumption-reducing effect results from the energy price level. Although import prices for the most important imported energies have fallen significantly over the course of the year, prices are still well above the 2021 level. The Working Group on Energy Balances assumes that the persistently high prices will both encourage savings and substitutions, but also lead to a reduction in energy-intensive production in Germany.

Demographic developments will have the effect of increasing consumption. A migration-related influx of 1.35 million people led to an increase in energy consumption of around 200 PJ.

Developments in the first three quarters

According to preliminary calculations by AG Energiebilanzen, energy consumption in Germany in the first nine months of the current year was 9% lower than in the same period of the previous year. Overall, the demand for energy reached a level of 7,813 PJ or 266.6 million tons by the end of September 2023. TCE. Excluding the impact of the weather, primary energy consumption would have fallen by 5.8% in the first nine months of the year.

Consumption of mineral oil fell by 5.1% year-on-year to 2,860 PJ (97.6 million TCE) in the first three quarters of 2023. While the consumption of petrol increased by more than 3%, the consumption of diesel fuel fell by a good 3%. The consumption of aviation fuel rose by 5 percent. Sales of light heating oil fell slightly by 3 percent. Deliveries of crude gasoline to the chemical industry were 16 percent lower.

Natural gas consumption fell by 7.2% to 1,838 PJ (62.7 million TCE) in the first three quarters of 2023. This development reflects declines in industrial demand as well as savings in private households and in the trade, commerce and services sector. Electricity generation from natural gas fell by 4%. The generation of district heating based on natural gas fell by just under 3%.

Hard coal consumption fell by 19.1% to 678 PJ (23.1 million TCE) in the reporting period. The 35% decline in electricity generation from hard coal had a particular impact on this development. Crude steel production fell by 3.6% as a result of the economic slowdown and coking plants reduced their output by 12%. Demand for hard coal in the steel industry fell by 1.6% overall.

At 663 PJ (22.6 million TCE), primary energy consumption of lignite in the first three quarters of 2023 was 23.4% lower than in the same period of the previous year. The decline essentially corresponds to the reduced deliveries to power plants for general supply. Electricity generation from lignite was influenced by the decline in electricity consumption, the reduction in generation capacities in the course of the gradual coal phase-out, the increase in electricity production from wind turbines and increased electricity imports from neighboring countries.

Electricity generation from nuclear energy fell by 72% in the first three quarters of 2023 compared to the same period of the previous year. The sharp decline is due to the shutdown of the last three nuclear power plants and their final decommissioning on April 15, 2023. Since this date, nuclear energy has no longer contributed to the energy supply in Germany.

In the first nine months of the year, 9.7 billion kilowatt hours (billion kWh) more electricity was imported from abroad than exported. Until May of the current year, the electricity exchange balance showed a clear export surplus, since then more has been imported on balance. AG Energiebilanzen sees this development as an indication of a well-functioning European electricity market: in some cases, cheaper generation options were available abroad than in Germany during the reporting period.

The contribution of renewable energies fell slightly by 0.3% to 1,516 PJ (51.7 million TCE) in the first nine months. Electricity generation from wind increased by 3 percent. There was a slight decrease of 1 percent in solar energy. Electricity generation from hydropower increased by 14 percent. Biomass, which accounts for almost 55% of the total primary energy consumption of renewable energies, fell 3% short of the previous year's figure.

According to estimates by AG Energiebilanzen, energy-related CO₂ emissions fell by around 11% in the first three quarters of 2023 as a result of lower overall consumption, particularly of fossil fuels. This corresponds to a reduction in the order of 55 million tons (mt). For 2023 as a whole, AG Energiebilanzen expects energy-related CO₂ emissions to decrease by 10.7%. The reduction contribution could reach around 65 million tons. Development of primary energy consumption from January to September 2023 Changes in percent - total 7,813 PJ or 266.6 million tce

Berlin - In the first nine months of 2023, primary energy consumption fell by 9% to 7,813 petajoules (PJ) or 266.6 million tons of coal equivalent (mtce) compared to the same period of the previous year. The decline is primarily due to the weak economic development, high energy prices and warmer weather compared to the previous year.

Source: Working Group on Energy Balances Further shifts in the energy mix Structure of primary energy consumption in Germany 1st-3rd quarter 2023 - total 7,813 PJ or 266.6 million TCE Shares in percent (previous year's period in brackets)

view more: ‹ prev next ›