NaoPb

joined 1 year ago
[–] NaoPb@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

You are probably right. My memories are of using Firefox on a PC with a mechanical hard drive. Back then Chrome seemed to have the upper hand. But these days Firefox loads instantly when you have an SSD. So yes, please ignore my earlier argument.

[–] NaoPb@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe ubuntu doesn't have it installed by default.

[–] NaoPb@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

What that reasoning we should install sauerbraten because most people have plenty of hdd space and broadband internet. Better yet, just install all the games so we can relax every now and then between the hard work.

[–] NaoPb@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How about Spookie's House of Jumpscares?

At least I think that's what it's called?

[–] NaoPb@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Interesting. I did not know that.

[–] NaoPb@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I remember Chrome starting nearly instantly. But that could be that it's doing some preloading. I haven't used Chrome in years though. 2 seconds for Firefox startup sounds about right yes.

As for memory, I wouldn't say Firefox is great. But I often have a lot of tabs open at once while I am researching some things and Firefox is just rock solid for me. It has had some memory leaks in the past but they seem to be mostly gone now. You'd probably find browsers that use less memory but I dare to question if they would use less memory than Firefox in my usecase.

In an unrelated note I am curious which modern browser (in Linux) uses the fewest amount of memory.

[–] NaoPb@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

My advice would be the latter. That case you can always use the same browser, no matter what OS you decide to use in the future.

[–] NaoPb@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Firefox has been slower to startup for a long time. Maybe a few seconds slower compared to Chrome. But it has always made up for it in it's memory usage. The more tabs you open, the worse Chrome gets.

[–] NaoPb@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I think I started using it in the 1.x times. I remember all the flaws it's had since. I've given lots of other browsers a try in the meantime but none come close to Firefox. They might be good enough for others but for power users Firefox is the way to go.

[–] NaoPb@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Firefox for sure.

[–] NaoPb@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm fine with just using the .deb .

I don't dislike flatpak and it's good that it exists but I prefer not using it if I don't have to.

[–] NaoPb@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Good on you. I was still watching cartoons in 1996. To be fair I matured very late (if ever).

view more: next ›