It is the Russian way
NewDayRocks
joined 6 months ago
Kamala reached out to Republican war criminal elites
You could just say Republicans. She reached out to the highest ranking Republicans with name recognition she could to have them speak to their base. The base that isn't going to listen to her directly and will not care about no name republican politicians.
The point is she tried to get disenfranchised R voters to switch over, the same thing Bernie is doing. One gets upvoted the other gets crucified.
I'm glad he is doing this because i agree with this strategy, but can someone explain to me why the online political strategists (in this case lemmy) seem to approve Bernie reaching across the aisle but seem appalled when Kamala tried to do the same?
No one dumb and selfish enough to vote for Trump will care about the suffering of people outside the US.
You're thinking of Free Guy with Ryan Renolds and not Gosling. I know this not because I made the same mistake or anything...
One more time
The judicial interprets, not "enforces".
The executive doing their job wrong doesn't change this.
My guy, you are right that this is taught in grade school civics class. But that isn't the zing you think it is.
The legislative makes the law The judicial interprets the law The executive enforces the law
Judges can't enforce anything. They need people from the executive side to do the enforcing.
You keep repeating the same misinformation throughout this post and are getting the down votes for it.
So it's a valid question to ask why all of the current fuckery has not translated into market chaos.
My reply addresses this with your 2nd point. What I'm trying to say is that maybe the market did factor in the fuckery and has so far believed it to be a nothing burger.
Everyone could be wrong, of course, but so far that is what the markets indicates. So naturally the follow up questions should be, are the markets wrong? Or am I (OP) consuming too much media from my bubble which is overexaggerating the doom and gloom?
You kind of get it with your own answer but are refusing to see it.
Why hasn't the market dropped yet with all the fuckery going on in DC? Because the impact of said fuckery has not occurred yet. Let this be a chance for some awareness of your own personal information bubble and possible over doom scrolling.
This is not saying this administration isn't going to cause some terrible shit. It just hasn't stuck yet. Nothing the administration has done has prevented Microsoft or Google or Netflix from collecting their subscription fees. The closest thing so far has been tariffs that came and went.
The third option is making a deal with the EU and continue fighting.
It's easy to say, but the author and his colleagues are not in a position to just "stop complying".
-
We don't know the author's exact work. It could just be administrative or something that wound not make sense to be worked on if they aren't delivering anything.
-
I'm not sure what work you expect then to do if their bosses are complying. If they are expected to be watch dogs, but the part of the organization that enforces the rules simply won't enforce them, then what do you want to be done? Send stern warnings to rule breakers knowing it's pointless?
It's a shitty situation that needs to be solved elsewhere.
To everyone not reading this article: "working along side IDF soldiers" in this case means being a student at a university where one professor had volunteered for a short stint to be a medic for the IDF (because, you know, Oct 7 happened)
She got suspended because she outed him (though not by name directly) in an interview and opened him up to possible harassment. The suspension is questionable and we can debate the limits of free speech in this case.
BUT she was not suspended because she refused to work with or for the IDF. That is a bs title.