this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
274 points (98.2% liked)

politics

20464 readers
2559 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 130 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Bills must be paid by Wednesday, or else.

... or else what, exactly? There seems to be a whole lot of sternly worded judicial opinions, but can they actually do anything to enforce said decisions??

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 67 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Anyone involved with the legal response or not releasing these funds can be arrested and held in contempt of court. This would obviously apply to Trump lackeys, and not himself. Do this a couple dozen times, and his entire cabinet has nobody to enforce their bullshit.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago

I'll believe it when one of them is in jail. More likely Trump would order US Marshalls not to arrest anyone working for the white house, and fire anyone that tried.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (9 children)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

US Marshals...

...who are part of the executive branch under the President's authority... 👀

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That sounds like a great way to go, but if the past four years have taught me anything it's that I shouldn't expect much of anything in the way of lasting consequences or impediments for Republicans from our courts.

I'll get excited when there are some arrests.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Have you noticed how stuck and stalled the Trump admin is right now? This is why. It's working. We're not even to the first court confrontation yet, which is due tomorrow. We need to see how far the judicitbranch is willing to go to issue punitive measures and enforce these things before we start crying that nothing is working.

This is the process in the US. It's worked pretty well against other bad actors, and we need to give it some time to play out as defined in due process before more drastic measures.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We need to see how far the judicitbranch is willing to go to issue punitive measures and enforce these things before we start crying that nothing is working.

Sorry to be skeptical bud but we got 4 years to prosecute Trump on his many many crimes when he was not protected by his King of America title and literally NOTHING happened to him...

You can sit and wait until the very last shred of the judicial systems shows you it has failed... by then 2 things would be true: 1) apparently you'll be convinced and 2) you won't have a country anymore

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not the fault of the Judicial branch, they don't prosecute crimes.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh come on.. they delayed every step of the way until Trump won again and now claim they cannot impose any sentence

also, it absolutely is the judicial branch's responsibility to prosecute crimes... that is why gov attorneys are referred to as "prosecutors"

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (12 children)

Have you noticed how stuck and stalled the Trump admin is right now?

No, I have not.

Edited to add - https://www.project2025.observer/

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How the right will interpret this;

JUDGES HAVE TOO MUCH POWER! REWRITE THE CONSTITUTION!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EndOfLine@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago (18 children)

Arrested by whom? Isn't it the executive branch that controls the enforcement of laws and judicial decisions?

Serious question. What power does the judiciary have to enforce their rulings.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Judges can deputize if necessary

[–] EndOfLine@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

Thank you for the response.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 37 points 2 days ago

Or else he will be asked again with a slightly more impatient tone.

[–] holdstrong@lemm.ee 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Start holding people in contempt of court I suppose. Not Trump but some of his lackeys. The real fireworks will be when Trump tells the U.S. Marshals to not enforce the order.

[–] Supervivens@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Why would he need to do this? He’d just pardon them at that point and there’s literally no repercussions for him or anyone associated besides the almost impossibility of him being impeached. You can thank the Supreme Court for that.

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can you be pardoned for contempt of court?

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For criminal contempt, but not civil.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Assuming the rule of law is respected.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago

Yeeep.

For anyone wondering how this all works, this article lays it out: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/02/trump-news-are-we-in-dictatorship-yet.html

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Time to bring back the medieval Writ of Outlawry. Literally make them outside the protection of the law. The lawless do not deserve the protection of the law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s time for Judge Dredd then.

Dunno, haven’t seen the movie.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Judges of Dredd's universe were judge, jury, and executioner. We may need them to have that power to combat the current regime, but once they have that there's no going back.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

So they're putting him in prison?

load more comments
view more: next ›