NoLifeGaming

joined 2 years ago
[–] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I hope this becomes a thing so we can have more competition

[–] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

Disappointing. RCV is how we can try to break free of the two parties.

[–] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Remember when people got mad at you for calling him Genocide Joe?

[–] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Pretty much. Most candidates from both parties are bought by AIPAC as well as other lobbies. We have an oligarchy.

[–] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I am a papirus man

[–] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

The article doesn't mention any issues related to policy, which made a lot of people not vote for the democrats.

What he did do was miniscule. The only good thing that I can think of is some of the student loan forgiveness.

[–] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

It should be, not support genocide. Corrected.

[–] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

No. But at least we punished the democrats and taught them a lesson.

Next time they should actually, you know, not support genocide.

[–] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The real question is how do you end up in a situation with two terrible candidates that will be happy to commit genocide with no consequences. It's a mutlistep issue.

[–] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

And I am a prince from Nigeria who will give you money if you send me your information

[–] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Simple. You punish zionists and democrats for backing genocide. If they keep losing on their positions then they'll learn to work for your vote. That's why always voting red or blue no matter what is bad. It just makes your vote worthless because you'll vote for them no matter what.

view more: next ›