NoneOfUrBusiness

This would've been cute if it wasn't so horrifying.

is false.

How so? Hamas attacked a number of Israeli military bases and outposts on October 7th, which was along with taking hostages the goal of the attack. The Israeli narrative conveniently ignores that, painting the whole thing as one big act of barbarism.

still Hamas killing innocent people is not deserving of compassion albeit I understand their reason.

It's not about compassion. They definitely committed a bunch of atrocities on October 7th, and that very much deserves condemnation, but ignoring the very real military goals behind the attacks helps no one but Israel. Nobody really talks about that anymore, but if you remember before it was overshadowed by the genocide in Gaza things like how much of Israeli accusations against Hamas was true, how many casualties were Israeli friendly fire, what Hamas's goals behind the attack were, etc etc were still open questions. The world quite reasonably stopped focusing on these things because Israel kept one-upping themselves in genociding Gazans, but that had the side effect of cementing the Israeli narrative on them as reality in the minds of most pro-Palestinian Westerners. What I'm saying is: Condemning terror that happened during the attack and condemning the attack itself are a different things, and one of them invalidates many legitimate acts of resistance.

I mean he helped create the Jewish state. That makes him a bad person right there.

Why are they talking about this like it's a good thing? It's one of the reasons they're hemorrhaging voters. I mean it goes to show that I've never heard of this and Republicans are still whining about immigration like it's the "worst" it's been in decades. And what the fuck is this guy thinking weren't border walls supposed to be bad what the fuck happened to Democrats these past two years?

Edit: Finally finished the video. If you'd come from the future to tell me about this stuff two years ago I'd have laughed at you. Say goodbye to Latino votes.

I guess I just don't have enough faith in democrat voters to do anything like this in large enough numbers, but I hope for the sake of the rest of the world that they do.

I mean okay but that's how it reads like, especially because that myth is still alive and well.

What legitimacy do you see in Israeli Apartheid? Because, long story short, that's what the Israeli side is selling.

Yes but that's the implication when you say "the terririst attack that killed 1200 young Israelis".

I admittedly don't keep up with the nitty gritty of American politics, but Harris is campaigning on fracking and Republican-style border control. If this doesn't sound like a rightward shift I don't know what is.

No, you're the one gambling democracy because Trump winning right now would guarantee an attack on all the institutions we have in place to try and maintain democracy in the US.

That's not what I meant when I said gambling democracy. Lemme just...

In statistics, gambler's ruin is the fact that a gambler playing a game with negative expected value will eventually go bankrupt, regardless of their betting system.

If you, on average, lose democracy every election, then you need to change the game you're playing or you'll eventually arrive at bankruptcy (aka fascism), and I don't see anyone talking about changing the game. It's all avoid Trump but yeah, then what?

What's your plan when Trump wins this time?

I mean I'm not American so my plan is to watch either way, but I'd hope the plan is to pressure the DNC to push actually electable candidates, hold real primaries and not ignore their constituents. I mean, I don't expect that to happen because Democrat voters have proven time and time again to be spineless and incapable of organizing—which is what allows the DNC to get away with this nonsense—but that's what I'd do if I was a politically active American.

Why won't that plan still work in 4 years if another Trump does surface?

The current DNC and Democrat voters' unwillingness to challenge it create an inherently unsustainable system that will only end with a Trump victory and the erasure of democracy (likely) or the DNC managing to push through the waves of Trumps while moving rightwards, picking up Republican policies while not allowing democracy to function until America effectively ceases to be a democracy (unlikely due to the first possibility, but possible). That's my problem with the "shut up and vote for her" stuff: It assumes that there's a light at the end of the bootlicking tunnel. Y'all need a way to get the DNC back on track and you need it fast, because this is a version of the gambler's ruin where instead of money you're gambling democracy and, to make matters worse, lose democracy even if you win the bet.

So omission bias? All this fanfare for omission bias? Nobody is using Mondoweiss as their primary news source; they have no reason to report on everything, especially an event like Nova music festival was reported on by everyone and their mother.