were fine with that because shit should just work.
This was Apple's literal marketing campaign when they were trying to make Macs popular again
were fine with that because shit should just work.
This was Apple's literal marketing campaign when they were trying to make Macs popular again
I know several, they're type that base their whole identity around their job, and the type to die very quickly after retirement. They also vote conservative.
I'm 6', but I have a comparatively long torso, so I generally have the seat set as low as possible in a sedan to be at a comfortable height, and even then, my head nearly touches the ceiling. Life before height-adjustable seats was interesting.
The 250 (rather 3/4T trucks in general) have limited consumer purpose, outside of towing large campers or car haulers. It's also the smallest class that is recommended for gooseneck/5th wheel towing.
Commercially, there are more applications for it like hauling fluids, or as a snow plow, as well as the same towing arguments for consumer use. However, once you get into that stuff, you'll find a 3/4T lacking, which is why you'll see more 1T (350/3500) commercial trucks. They really are a bit of a silly 'in between' size.
For trades however, I would argue that any standard pickup truck is not the appropriate tool, vans are far more suitable for their use. Large "indoor" storage, tall enough to walk upright in, low to the ground so easy to enter/exit with tools, and they can be outfitted to store stuff on the walls.
I had my windows replaced a few years ago, and the work crew rolled up in a cube van, and inside it was set up basically as a woodworking shop, pretty much ready to go. They didn't have to unload tools, set up tables, etc., just un-fasten some safety clamps, plug in an extension cord, and off they went. Maybe 15 minutes from parking to starting work, and that's including taking some time to chit-chat with me.
That truck has not, and will not, experience a single second of actual work.
Software updates can be deployed regionally either based on carrier or by product SKU. If there are different SKUs for North American vs EU phones, which is almost universally the case because of differing regional requirements such as radio technology, target price points and so on. That means that phone model 'X (NA)' could have a different update schedule than 'X (EU)'.
Why? money, of course. There is a small cost to supporting a SKU for updates, even if it's the same software that's already being deployed to another SKU. That increases if the two SKUs have different processors (Samsung does this). On top of that, longer update schedules means people aren't replacing their phones as often, which means theoretically less sales - though I find that claim dubious as many people replace their phones long before they lose software support.
So yes, while it's possible that a company might honour a 7 year update schedule outside of EU, it would be by their choice to do so.
and aren't disqualified by one of their dozens of contingencies
one of which is having HIV
There is definitive and concrete proof that hydration has a 100% mortality rate.
.... I don't think there's any combination of those that are good. Best option still has you shitting blue.
From someone who does this for a living... vary your names and addresses. Less chance of collisions if your suite teardown fails to clean up properly. Depending on your needs, having a hard-coded unique name/address per test can be fine, or if you're using Python, there's a library called Faker that will generate ISO-valid test data. It's also a bit easier to see where a teardown failed if maybe an exception got swallowed.
Both, really. Shitty social support in that he likely had an F-tier education, leading to being obsessed with power.
Even with the lithium mining, an EV will reach "pollution parity" with a comparable sized ICE vehicle anywhere from 6 months to 5 years on the road, largely depending on what is powering the electrical grid (coal fired electricity being the 5 year), with the average being 1-2 years. That means that an EV from 2023 on average has caused less total pollution than an ICE vehicle of the same age.
On top of that, there has been significant progress made in recycling these batteries so that less lithium needs to be mined, as well as using other metals such as sodium, both sodium ion and sodium iron batteries are commercially available.