I think it was due to someone gossiping about that, but yeah that's the only unpleasent background I could find in that article. The paragraph even ends on a positive note.
I just dislike it if people throw around a source as an argument without constructing their argument.
I have read it and it is not clear to me what exactly they wish to say.
Now, personally I don't care but if they were to elaborate on what they mean I would read and maybe understand their argument.
Edit: they instead of you
Do you care to elaborate?
Does this qualify as a comic?
Russia, the epitome of left ideology!
Lenny!?!
Because he was a four year old boy, I reckon.
Shot right through the heart <3
Whether it be an opt-out or -in situation is beyond the topic of this question, but neither are applicable here.
I think that's an easy one: Hitler is dead and, as far as I know, never had any direct descendants or relatives that could object on valid reasons.
Botname checks out.
Why bother with a caption if you only repeat the headline?