Because sociology is a science??
PoastRotato
You're right. This is so much better.
Well, no. It dies because you're unwilling to fund it. Because apparently finding your wallet is too much effort.
What if you want a cookie, but not enough to go to the grocery store and buy some cookies?
Then you don't get any fucking cookies.
...You gotta let me borrow your shower sometime.
Even if I were doing nothing but posting on social media, you would literally be doing less than that with all your demoralizing doom posting. Just because you're too myopic to see a way out of this mess doesn't mean you need to go around spewing your defeatism all over everyone else and dissuading them from meaningful action in the process.
Once again, I implore you to shut the fuck up. You are part of the problem right now.
This is a miserably defeatist attitude and it helps no one. If you're not going to say anything useful, then just stay out of our way, please.
I've been saying this for years! Meat, sweet, and heat. The pizza trifecta.
Her first mistake was talking out loud
To be fair, if you were taking advice from Yahoo Answers in the first place then you were definitely getting what you paid for.
Treating someone as subhuman is a wholly separate action from calling someone's actions inhuman.
Yes, but one definitely leads to the other. The rhetoric informs the action; if one hears something enough times, they may eventually begin to believe it's true.
I just simply can't agree that calling someone inhuman for their oppressive actions towards another human being is anywhere near the same level as calling someone inhuman for simply existing.
Fair enough, we seem to agree on the larger issue here so I won't force the argument. But perhaps you can at least agree that calling those oppressive actions inhuman is directly denying the fact that humans are perfectly capable of such great evils. Which, evidently, they are.
This is an unhinged take