PoastRotato

joined 2 years ago
[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is an unhinged take

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Because sociology is a science??

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

You're right. This is so much better.

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Well, no. It dies because you're unwilling to fund it. Because apparently finding your wallet is too much effort.

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

What if you want a cookie, but not enough to go to the grocery store and buy some cookies?

Then you don't get any fucking cookies.

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

...You gotta let me borrow your shower sometime.

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even if I were doing nothing but posting on social media, you would literally be doing less than that with all your demoralizing doom posting. Just because you're too myopic to see a way out of this mess doesn't mean you need to go around spewing your defeatism all over everyone else and dissuading them from meaningful action in the process.

Once again, I implore you to shut the fuck up. You are part of the problem right now.

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

This is a miserably defeatist attitude and it helps no one. If you're not going to say anything useful, then just stay out of our way, please.

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've been saying this for years! Meat, sweet, and heat. The pizza trifecta.

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago

Her first mistake was talking out loud

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be fair, if you were taking advice from Yahoo Answers in the first place then you were definitely getting what you paid for.

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Treating someone as subhuman is a wholly separate action from calling someone's actions inhuman.

Yes, but one definitely leads to the other. The rhetoric informs the action; if one hears something enough times, they may eventually begin to believe it's true.

I just simply can't agree that calling someone inhuman for their oppressive actions towards another human being is anywhere near the same level as calling someone inhuman for simply existing.

Fair enough, we seem to agree on the larger issue here so I won't force the argument. But perhaps you can at least agree that calling those oppressive actions inhuman is directly denying the fact that humans are perfectly capable of such great evils. Which, evidently, they are.

view more: next ›