PoastRotato

We know. Everyone knows. It's just how we refer to the Democratic Party here. At this point, I think the only people who don't know the difference are the ones wouldn't care to make the distinction in the first place. Getting upset over it makes about as much sense as getting upset at British people for calling a sweater a jumper.

This is wack

You're right, the Democrats chose to ignore what the Michigan voters were telling them. And in response, Michigan voters didn't vote for Democrats, and the world got objectively worse as a result, because Trump was elected to office.

Democrats failed their constituents. And the constituents who didn't vote out of protest allowed Trump to become president and make the world worse--even knowing that he was the worse option. Both of these things are true. We don't have to pretend like it's one or the other.

I find it very easy to blame presidents for high gas prices due to their reluctance to go after corporations.

It means they counted more votes than there are people who could have possibly voted. If Alaska had a voting-eligible population of 100, then they counted 114 votes. Which means there was significant voter fraud.

You're right of course, but I think the intention was to illustrate that she (like the machine) is a dangerous object that will hurt you if you get too close.

Ah, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the graphic, but why the hell is a password that would take 9000 years to crack not considered secure enough to be colored green? What context would even realistically allow for the password to still be relevant at that point?

Couldn't you just, like... read something else though? Clearly these comics have an audience that appreciates them, and you're not in it, and that's okay. Pizza Cake's comics aren't doing any harm to the medium; all those comics you mentioned are still out there for you and everyone else to enjoy, no one is taking that away from you. It's not some great shame to the art of comics for Pizza Cake's content to just exist.

Like, I love reading books, but I'm not a fan of sappy romance novels. But I'd never suggest that people writing sappy romance novels are diminishing the medium; I just ignore them and move on with my life.

I agree with the sentiment, but can we please quit it with the Christian eschatology analogies? There are enough nutbags out there drawing the same comparisons as it is, except they take them literally and find them encouraging.

Plus, in my opinion, the more we equate these people with mythological figures of doom and dread, the harder it becomes to feel like we can actually do anything about them.

I think they were trying to point out the double standard here. As a Democrat, she gets hung out to dry over a tiny infraction, whereas Republicans are openly corrupt and face 0 consequences. They're saying if she ran as a Republican this incident would never have been a problem because the bar is so low for them.

Oh neat, misogynistic and transphobic