Prunebutt

joined 2 years ago
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 weeks ago

A Zappa reference on the internet? Neat!

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -3 points 4 weeks ago (25 children)

I ex'lained how it couldn't have been a centrally planned system, because that would've violated Ashby's law. You replied with "nuh-uh", because you refuse to learn.

That's like you claiming that energy can be created, I reply that this would violate the law of conversation of energy and you reply with "but energy does get created in a power plant."

You have no idea of the theory and maybe have had a quick glance at some wikipedia article.

Real "there are only two genders - I learned so in biology class"-vibes.

and I already proved that I am willing to change my beliefs

And I'm sure that since you've done it once already, you don't need to do so anymore, because now you've got it all figured out. /s

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 weeks ago

He's probably also unable to lie.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -3 points 1 month ago (27 children)

Ok, I give up. You have no idea abOut cybersyn and don't care about learning anything that could expand your already formed believes.

Should've known.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why does the assumed connotation matter if the targeted meaning was laid bare if not for your stubborn ass to get the last word in?

Want to examine those connotations? /s

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You can't help it telling me what I meant when I explicitly told you what I meant, huh? Are you trying to gaslight me, or something? Because that's a fucked up thing to do.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -5 points 1 month ago (29 children)

I know you have trouble grasping the concept of authority. That's like... your whole deal. Just imagine being a Marxist without all the vanguard party and replacing the bourgeoisie with a class of bureaucrats bullshit.

Cybersyn can't have been centrally planned btw, as central planning violates Ashby's Law of Requisite Variety.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Read the encircled definition again. Terms can have more than one meaning, dawg.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 month ago (31 children)

Where exactly does it state in that article that the USSR applied cybernetig principles in managing systems of production and management?

FFS, how can someone be so arrogant with so much stiched together half-knowledge? Seriously, check out the General Intellect Unit podcast, if you're actually interested, but don't act so smug, stating bullshit on things where you only skimmed the wikipedia page. It's done by (anti-authoritarian) Marxists, if that helps.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 month ago (33 children)

The bullshit about it being "first pioneered by the soviets". Stafford Beer wasn't a Soviet.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

Yeah, I personally dislike it if people don't have the guts to call me a liar and hide behind their arbitrary definitions that suit their point best. So I guess we're all unhappy now.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (35 children)

I have read up on theory, don't worry.

Like shit you have if you don't recognize the title "brain of the firm" being written by the fucking architect of Cybersyn.

view more: ‹ prev next ›