Prunebutt

joined 2 years ago
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's probably going to cost about the same as the Index did

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I played it with ALVR on Linux with a meta quest 2 from start to finish like a year ago. ran like a champion (ok, it froze like every 3 hours, now that I think of it).

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't want meat on my pizza, dingus.

... or do I? Tell me what I think, dammit! /s

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Please tell me more about my intentions, since you apparently know them better than I do.

What should I get on my Pizza, for example?

/s

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Funny and derogatory are famously mutually exclusive. /s

you didn't intend it to be funny

Bold of you to assume intentions of strangers on the internet.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 month ago

That's a bonus of federation: the pidgeonholing comes free of charge.

I also like to dunk of world, too, though. db0 are the cool kids.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (38 children)

Nope, it was decentralized. Read up on the theory, dawg.

If you call that system centralized, then most anarchists want to establish a centralized system.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 month ago (18 children)

The power dynamic is funnier that way. It implies an infantilisation of Marx and that he was only friends with Engels because of the money.

There, you've made me explain my own joke. I hope you're happy. /s

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -3 points 1 month ago (22 children)

Why else would you phrase it this way?

Because Marx was financially dependent on Engels. As people with sugar daddies often are.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 month ago (55 children)

Project Cybersyn was a real, socialist, working system, comrade and it was based on the same principles as brain of the firm.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 month ago (24 children)

So the "first" definition is the only one or what? What's it with you and your refusal to accept that there are more than one way to interpret things, sometimes?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -5 points 1 month ago (27 children)

The "Sugar" part still refers to the connotations of sexual favors,

That's your interpretation. It can also refer to a power dynamic or state of affection from the giver to the receiver.

That's like claiming the term implies pedophilia, or domnestic abuse, because of the "daddy" part.

You're the one who made it sexual.

view more: ‹ prev next ›