QuentinCallaghan

joined 3 years ago
 

The glaring error here is that "28 Weeks Later" from 2007 is ignored as it was the first sequel. Therefore the upcoming third movie wouldn't be "the start of a trilogy" but the end of it. Of course "28 Weeks Later" is mentioned but otherwise the article words the sequel talk in a clumsy manner.

 

IMO I don't any point for making a sequel to the original 40 years later.

view more: ‹ prev next ›