Rakudjo

joined 1 year ago
[–] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Just grab 'em by the pussy, I guess?

[–] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

You can't bring up my past decisions and hold them against me. People can grow, learn, and change.

Sorry, advocate for the devil; you've had 8 years to grow and reflect on the first presidency. That defense doesn't work twice!

[–] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Democratic Engagement to Elect Sanders. DEES nuts, we could even call it!

[–] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And even if it doesn't, it'll still make hundreds of trillions of dollars doing it, so it was worth it in the end.

[–] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I think you're confusing it with Ms. Information. Which would cause information to be female, and as a female, information has no rights. Ms. Information does not get to be free.

/s

[–] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Doritos Dew It Right!

[–] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Electrical lighting is more economical, anyways.

[–] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

My take? Young people have no money, interest rates suck, but when a home becomes available that is affordable,

We had an offer for cash, as is, and took it

Sounds like an issue of being unable to get into the market (that you continued to propogate). Young people are poor, so they're unable to compete.

[–] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Who watches the watchmen?

[–] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

It's like using a gun to make Swiss cheese!

[–] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Make it retroactive so that everyone that's already retired has to come back and work an additional 3-5 years. Lazy boomers won't do it.

[–] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, the commentor above you is correct. This was a Texas man officiating a wedding in Nebraska (happens to be local news to me).

view more: next ›