How would you verify that?
RandomVideos
joined 2 years ago
Has anyone ever defended the copyright of a massive corporation when talking about AI?
Image generation, during its training, tries to get as close as possible to the image its training on. The way the AI trains isnt even remotely close to how humans do it
Also, copyright is not the only reason why people hate AI. Obviously another reason would be presented if one is eliminated. It doesnt just appear out of nowhere
Thats what i thought before 2 pro-Trump fascists almost won the election in my country
But it would be wrong by only 1% and it would make the speed of light so much more easy to use and remember
What if i know how to read, but not how to write?
Gender changing potion
Use an open source android ROM like lineageOS
You dnot need to untsrednad all the cnometmms you raed
But if the people deciding what the meter was at first were allowed to make errors, why werent the people deciding what the new meter was?
What kinds of games are they making that cost 71569457046263802294811533723186532165584657342365752577109445058227039255480148842668944867280814080000000000000000000 USD and who is paying for them?
Wasnt it defined using a wrong measurement of the size of the Earth?
I never said that the images were saved. I said that the AI was trained to copy the images, not that it had a way to check them after it trained
Even though both can "know" styles, the methods used to train humans and AI and how they act is completely different. A human doesnt start with noise and gradually removes it to create an image