The same laws that protect drunk, unconscious, disabled, senile, or otherwise incapacitated people would still apply. Here, the 18-year-old with a child's mind would be deemed incompetent, and assigned a guardian.
Rivalarrival
joined 2 years ago
Clinton and Trump, high-fiving while spitroasting an 8-year-old.
Buncha idiots.
Sea-going vessels don't have restrictions on commercial use. Conveyances do. So, take your conveyance down to the boat ramp, position at least one wheel in the water to demonstrate it is a water-going vessel. Remove the "conveyance" placard, affix a "vessel" placard, and you now have a self-portaging vessel, free of the encumberences upon land vehicles and conveyances.
It makes me happy to see the depth of the down votes on your comment.
Cool, Cool.
Now, about that Epstein list, and all the children you've raped...
You think he can convince people to vote against their own interests in support of the "greater good" of "owning the libs"?
Whatsisface was picked specifically because he doesn't pose a threat to the cult leader.
ICE and the ICC target his lieutenants. Epstein targets the fucker himself.
Take down ICE, and he commits his next atrocity with FEMA, or DEA or the Bureau of Land Management.
Take him down, and Corporal Couchfucker can't hold the GOP together.
Ezekiel 23:20
Got me through some hard times.
Genesis 19:31
Ezekiel 23:20
Laws are for generalities. Courts are for specificities. The situation you describe is resolved in the courts, not by legislation.
If the guardian is the problem, the courts assign a new guardian. That guardian can be another relative, or it could be a department of the state.