To me, autonomous vehicles are like AI (it actually is AI in the case of Tesla): the public perception is that it's way better than it really is because it's really good in 80% of cases. But to get to 90-95% will take many many years still. That doesn't mean we shouldn't use them, neither abandon them. To progress, we have to keep using them with caution. Learn the limits and work within it. Don't start firing people to be replaced with AI because in a few months and years you'll realize that the 20% left to improve will be hurting more than your thought. The same way you shouldn't remove drivers just yet.
RushingSquirrel
joined 2 years ago
Right in front of the US embassy, not long after some people from the embassy asked him to leave.
It's not really loitering though, more like "strolling without motive" (which he had). He refused to provide identification when asked.
To the contrary, he's trying to say what he made on Twitter has more credibility than Wikipedia.
His shares of Tesla (660B), SpaceX (150B), Boring Co (7B) and Neuralink (5B) give him all the credit he needs. Plus he's got some good investor friends (as we saw in the Twitter purchase). He doesn't even need to liquidate any holdings.
I keep the Bluetooth icon always visible in the system tray, double clicking it opens the paired devices directly. Still working on 11.
But he did it while feeling it with them
This is why AI is a solution, not coding everything. How does one learn how to react in these situations? Either you've learned from watching your parents, by taking lessons, reading the code or by simply following the others. The goal of an AI is to be able to do just that. Coding every single use case is way too complex.
I know Tesla has worked on improving emergency vehicles situations, but I don't know how and what's the current state.
Why are you being downvoted?