STVDC

joined 11 months ago
[–] STVDC@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

In this case, the lens is your "weak" point. I'm not a Canon guy so I don't know all the models, but I'm reading that the r10 is decent in low light. If you can possibly find an inexpensive prime (not zoom) lens with a faster aperture (low f number, like f1.8 or below, or even f2) you'll immediately see a massive improvement.

[–] STVDC@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yours is beautiful. Mine is simply to photograph the earth from space.

[–] STVDC@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Disagree that "no piece... is ever as important". Try shooting fighting hummingbirds in the poorly lit and dense cloud forests of South America with a cell phone or point and shoot and getting 4 perfect sequence shots within 1/5 second. Try photographing Jupiter with a kit lens. You can have the best subject or situation ever, and if you don't have the right tool it can be totally wasted. There are plenty of situations where these things must complement each other. Gear doesn't matter... until it does and you're caught out. Also, for this thread (and others) people just like to see how others have progressed, and more importantly why. Like why do I have a Z9 now instead of just keeping my D90 from 15 years ago? Maybe people look at what others have done and decide they don't need to do that. Don't worry that other people think about gear.