Scoopta

joined 2 years ago
[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

I'm assuming by this you mean the developers of JS /s

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 36 points 4 days ago (9 children)

As someone who mostly avoids JavaScript, I don't see the IT in this image, I just see a bad language I avoid!

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago

LOL, I've actually heard of it, but I have not played it. Ofc that game never even crossed my mind when writing my comment haha. I suppose choose your own adventure style books also fall into this category.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 26 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Even with 2D games that's basically impossible. Only time it could work is with turn based games and then...you end up with this post lol.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 5 points 5 days ago

Or just use NAT64? That's the conventional way to do this. Yes a VPN works but it's a tunnel, NAT64 just maps the entire IPv4 internet into v6 space and clients just use native v6 to get out. It's easy to setup on a VPS and there are even public instances. https://nat64.net/

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah I understand that. And as I noted with the exception of firmware which almost universally requires running very out of date hardware I do the same. I'd like to get there with my phone but I haven't managed it yet. I have written off firmware being FOSS because as mentioned. You almost always need very old hardware for that outside of embedded devices. And if you go down the firmware rabbit hole you probably have to draw the line somewhere. Platform firmware is the one everyone focuses on but what about GPU or NIC firmware? What about microcode or firmware embedded in the IME or PSP? Yes you can sometimes neuter the IME but that doesn't apply to all CPUs. It's just an unwinnable rabbit hole without going to a fully open computing platform.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Router yes, actually router is running coreboot and tiano core with OpenWRT. Does still have proprietary microcode though, and WiFi firmware. All my WAPs also run OpenWRT. I don't have a modem, I have fiber. The ONT is probably running something proprietary but as far as I'm concerned that's ISP equipment, not mine. Phone...not quite. I tried...it is running an AOSP rom...but going to a full Linux phone never quite worked out. That being said I was originally referring to my laptop and desktop which make use of no proprietary software or drivers. I do go FOSS to the extreme as much as possible. I just haven't figured out the phone. I did try going f-droid only for a while but it made basic tasks on my phone substantially more difficult.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 14 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It's funny seeing blogs about this because I live with 100% FOSS, minus firmware

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is it rarer? I think a lot of modern languages go for the first option but pretty much all C style languages use the latter. It's probably a wash for which is more popular I'd think.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ok but, in the second example you typically just put final or const in front of the type to denote immutability. I still don't see the advantage to the first declaration.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You aren't though. In most languages that use the latter declaration you would prefix the declaration with final or const or the like to specify it won't be updated.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 53 points 2 weeks ago

Can I just say it's hilarious you marked this NSFW, it is quite literally NSFW

 
view more: next ›