Finally someone who understands the nuance here.
SeedyOne
joined 2 years ago
You're naive to think it's just starting now.
They hated him for he spoke the truth...
RIP legend. He always acted his ass off, every role.
Fair points, but I'd imagine any single person attempting what you propose would automatically fear for their lives, becoming a huge target. That certainly would be the hero move though.
Oh the irony of you telling us to read when you literally can't figure out that yes, I was talking to YOU. When I said "your first post" it meant yours not the OP. Look in a mirror.
If it takes three paragraphs and your specific voting location to explain why your vote "technically" won't go to 45, maybe those people are right. The problem is that there are a LOT of people that don't understand the nuance and we have to plan for the lowest common denominator, otherwise people in actual swing states will see posts like your first one (lacking any explanation) and run with it. For them, a third party vote actually is helping 45.
Additionally, there's a decent argument to be made about total votes even though they don't "technically" decide the president. That number still matters and a lot of weight is thrown around with it. For all we know, this whole thing could hit the courts and having every advantage may be necessary to save our future.
Teleconference chat at 2400 baud was something else.
And yet crypto is back up again for some dumb reason. Are we sure NFTs are truly dead or are we going to see that grift in a new form soon? One can only hope it's the former.
What a ridiculous title, article and post.
Some very interesting stats. I wondered who might take over as RARBG exited the scene.
As does decades of systematically defunding education. The decades of leaded gas/paint by prior generations probably weren't helping...