this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
173 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37739 readers
578 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Article seems pretty flawed. Relevance is a vague metric, and the author relies pretty heavily on data related to government site visitation, which seems subject to bias toward certain types of users.

Market share is likely still incredibly low, but Firefox's relevance should be spiking right now due to Google's shenanigans with Chromium. The fact that like 90% of revenue for its for-profit wing is from Google is still troubling.

Any alternative views out there?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rwhitisissle@beehaw.org 177 points 10 months ago (10 children)

The day Firefox shutters its doors is the day the internet truly dies. Almost every "alternative" browser is chromium under the hood. Google's next big plan is basically constructing a walled garden around the internet (at least the HTTP part) via complex DRM. Eventually, if you want to access an actual web page, it'll have to be via a Chromium browser. Hell, even today a shitload of websites I visit on FF just don't fucking render correctly and I'll have to fire up a chromium instance just to access them. That's only going to get worse with time.

[–] Poggervania@kbin.social 50 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

I mean, you can argue that Google actually has a monopoly on web browsers right now. iirc Firefox takes a ton of money from Google, so if the choices are “Google’s proprietary browser” or “a non-Chromium browser backed by Google” (EDIT: unless you’re on Apple hardware and use Safari), then Google comes out on top either way.

Wish we could get another good browser engine that isn’t Chromium, WebKit, or Quantum.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 57 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Ehh

There's a clear difference between accepting money from an entity and letting it control things and make decisions. Pushing for a full and clear separation from any potential conflict of interest (while noble) is how projects die.

I'd love for Firefox to be fully funded through small anonymous public donations in an ideal world. As it is, I don't see an issue from taking Google's money to do something that most users would want anyways.

If the default search wasn't google, I'm certain even more users would bail on Firefox. Anyone who does want an alternative search engine is capable of clicking on it during installation.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] natecox@programming.dev 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m fighting the good fight by using Safari to browse and Kagi to search. I have effectively eliminated Google from my life and I could not be happier about it.

Signed, a former Google fan who got tired of being the product for their ever shittier services.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 24 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Apple and Google deserve about the same amount of trust. I don't know that Safari is any better than Chrome other than keeping a large portion of users in a secondary browser. I guess it all depends on whether uBlock Origin is able to be loaded on it along with other useful extensions. I'm a Firefox fan though.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 15 points 10 months ago

Apple has their own set of issues for sure, but I don’t think they’re comparable to the spyware advertising conglomerate that is Google.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I'm still sad about the day the real Opera with the presto rendering engine died. And while Vivaldi is getting many of the features and functionality, it's still a chromium rebuild. I guess it just takes too much money to build your own rendering engine anymore.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] azdle@news.idlestate.org 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The day Firefox shutters its doors is the day the internet truly dies.

*the web

The internet has so far been doing a much better job surviving as a proper decentralized system than the web.

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 14 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Really? What's left of the Internet beyond the web?

How many people use Usenet today, rather than forums or social media on the web?

How many people use IRC, rather than Slack? (Either on the web or in a Chromium-backed desktop app)

How many people use an email client, rather than webmail?

[–] flexibeast@beehaw.org 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Some non-HTTP(S) Internet stuff:

Email is transferred to its destination (where, sure it might be accessed through a Web UI) via SMTP. Even where things like Slack are used internally, email usage between organisations is still extensive, due to effectively being a federated lowest-common-denominator system that's not completely at the mercy of a single vendor.

VoIP, which increasingly underlies telephony/mobile networks, uses things like SIP, RTP and RTCP - even if, again, it might be accessed via a Web UI, it doesn't have to be, and there are dedicated clients.

SSH is widely used for remote system administration. SFTP, built on top of SSH, is used to transfer sensitive data, e.g. (in the US) medical records covered by HIPAA.

SNMP is used for network device management, sometimes doing so via the Internet.

Don't confuse certain end-user applications with the Internet more generally.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Valmond@beehaw.org 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

curl -k IP_Address

Open in notepad.

Read.

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 14 points 10 months ago

"Oh, an empty HTML tag and 2Mb of JavaScript!"

[–] Thymos@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

Hell, even today a shitload of websites I visit on FF just don’t fucking render correctly and I’ll have to fire up a chromium instance just to access them.

Can you link to an example? I remember this from years ago, but haven't encountered it for a long time.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 86 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Firefox is far from irrelevant. Pure stupid click bait. Market share of courses is a sad thing and may lead to irrelevance when most web sites stop supporting. In the late days of Netscape and the early days of Firefox that was the case... lack of website support. I am just starting to see that again.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 55 points 10 months ago (1 children)

People are idiots. I've used Firefox for nearly 20 years and have zero plans to change.

[–] Zworf@beehaw.org 13 points 10 months ago

Same here, it's only getting better. Especially lately with mobile firefox finally getting up to scratch. The desktop browser has alwaysbeen great.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 51 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Article seems pretty flawed. Relevance is a vague metric, and the author relies pretty heavily on data related to government site visitation, which seems subject to bias toward certain types of users.

You mean like government (and business) employees that are forced to use some flavor of ~~Internet Explorer~~ Chromium?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 46 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Is Firefox considered bad? It works well for me and when I use Chrome or edge It feels full of junk features

[–] ConstableJelly@beehaw.org 23 points 10 months ago

I don't think so. The article claims Firefox lost some of its lead developers to Google when it started developing Chrome and then took a long time to regain its footing around 2017. That sounds about right to my recollection. I had admittedly switched to Chrome myself for a while (I'm not terribly tech-savvy, maybe a little more than average) but switched back to Firefox last year. I am still pretty deeply embedded in the Google ecosystem though in other ways.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Firefox has been nice to work with on my end. And fast. Even the dev tools are way better than they were a decade ago. Almost all the important extensions work on it.

I don't really understand how its market share is so low now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)

From ZDNet. How much did they get paid to post this article?

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

How much did they get paid by a PR firm who's subsidized entirely by Alphabet, Inc.?

[–] legocorp@reddthat.com 31 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I've recently moved away from Chrome to Firefox and the transition was so seamless that I'm surprised. The main reason for the change is that Firefox for android now allows addons, serious addons not just the mobile ones. Before I was using a chrome / kiwi browser combo. So happy that now I can sync my desktop and phone :)

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

the problem with firefox is that chrome's marketing is just too prevalent among the general population; it's built into their gmail, their phone, everything that they use.

as a flutter dev it's especially frustrating since debugging on the web requires chrome (please help boost this issue in the issue queue: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/55324)

on the other hand they also reached their goal of over $3m grassroots donations in 2023, which goes a long way to scaling back on the reliance of google donations.

you also have to remember that web statistics are largely done by third party sources - like google analytics - or through telemetry. in the first case, many firefox users or those with adblockers will disable that. in the second case, this is exactly why i implore people to not disable telemetry in firefox since it's necessary for bug testing and usability studies but also for determining reach of software.

personally i prefer firefox but still use a mix of google products, including maps, youtube premium/music, and drive (which i pay for). i also have a monthly donation to mozilla and thunderbird. it's not much but every little bit helps - even $5

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stanka@lemmy.ml 29 points 10 months ago

"slides into irrelevance" - zdnet

[–] Quexotic@beehaw.org 29 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I will be honest. I didn't read that article because it's too click-baity. Using https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/ I see that Firefox is about 3% of 5b users. Not insignificant.

That 3% is about 150mil users. IMO, less than it should be. Google has great security, but terrible privacy. I switched middle of last year, from brave to FF for reasons I won't get into here. Suffice it to say, they are numerous.

It truly is troubling that they don't have independent funding. I, for one would pay $10/y for this service. Maybe I could donate?

Anyway, it's a superior product in many ways.

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 13 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I would say a good half of posts on Lemmy are too click-baity for me to actually look at. Every title clearly has picked a side and it's rare to see something even attempt to be impartial

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's total browser market. On Desktop it's 7.61%, in Germany 17.93%, making it second place (though Edge isn't far behind). Europe is 10.56%, North America pretty much average, Asia and South America are dragging it down.

It truly is troubling that they don’t have independent funding. I, for one would pay $10/y for this service. Maybe I could donate?

Firefox is Mozilla's cash cow, it's how they're earning funds for their charitable work. And google btw isn't the only one paying them, which search engine is the default depends on where you are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 20 points 10 months ago

gives us a running count of the last 90 days of US government website visits. That doesn't tell us much about global web browser use, but it's the best information we have about American web browser users today.

Lmao article itself saying it's a steaming pile of chrome

[–] azerial@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ironic that ZD-Net is speaking of relevancy. Ha

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Users that use Firefox are unlikely to show up in data used for these kinda articles I’d think

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ares35@kbin.social 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

users can modify their useragent string, and sometimes they have to because some webdevs are morons.

some browsers actually default to using chrome instead of its own.

using a browser-reported useragent string to count marketshare itself is flawed from the start, using a very narrow and limited scope of web sites to measure it--even more so.

if i counted my own clients: home, soho and small business end users... it's about even between chrome and firefox on windows (chrome users doing so on their own, as we highly recommend firefox, and vivaldi over chrome for a chromium-based solution) with edge trailing far behind; and about 3 to 1 android (chrome) over safari on mobile with (so far, but soon to change) very few mobile firefox users.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mwalimu@baraza.africa 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Cold plain metrics can easily hide social complexity.

Assume 10 investigative journalists use modded privacy-friendly Firefox for year long investigation. Then their report is read by 10 million average news reader on stock browsers like Chrome. Network logics tell us that Firefox browser has asymmetrical value in the ecosystem than plain usage metrics can ever reveal.

The obsession with numbers (the more the better) is a major blinding effect in societies driven by hierarchical cultures.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Mitchell Baker is being paid $7m a year to drive it into the ground.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Floon@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if Firefox users are more likely to spoof their user agent setting? Probably not.

I'll still use it. Compared to every other browser, it is the least disastrous regarding privacy.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I always spoof the ua. Not for privacy (though it helps), but because some sites artificially break for certain browsers or OSs and work perfectly fine when they think you're on a different browser. The artificial restriction should be illegal, but it isn't.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are you just here to spark a browser war? Claims like "firefox is dead" are guaranteed to get a shit ton of comments stating the exact opposite, backed up with annecdotal evidence.

I feel obliged to do the same though. So let me tell you that I've recently switched back to firefox after years of chrome and I haven't regretted it one single moment.

[–] ConstableJelly@beehaw.org 17 points 10 months ago

Me? Not at all. I actually posted this out of concern because, as I've said elsewhere, I'm a Firefox user, and my layman's impression was that its reputation has been improving over the past couple years. I assumed its user base was doing the same as people grew increasingly concerned with Google's intentions.

Apparently ZDnet has some reputational issues itself I was unaware of.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I use Edge for corporate intranet, Safari for anything with real-life connected personal accounts, and Firefox for everything else. Have done so for over a decade (with Edge previously being Chrome and before that IE).

This means government sites would mostly see me as a Safari user, with the occasional Edge visit, unless I was just looking something up, in which case it’d be Firefox.

According to YouTube, I’d be 99% a Firefox user.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›