SkyeStarfall

joined 2 years ago

Or they were into older men, as it doesn't sound like these were anything more than non-committal sex

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd you're talking about cloud computing for gaming specifically (as you can of course use cloud computing for, well, everything), then maybe it's not good enough in the US, I don't know enough about that area to say, but networking is definitively more than sufficient in Europe.

That's a diagram from the same article, actually

At least, assuming there is a future, they will be vindicated. Future generations will greatly appreciate finding archives such as this.

This was done by an archival group, primarily for the purposes of preservation. Don't know if it helps make you feel better, but at least personally I think complete archives of human cultural output, if possible, are important. So much has already been lost over the course of history

I would definitively notice immediately. It would just feel.. wrong

I wonder, have you ever made a game yourself? I have

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, users might get a bit upset about "abrasive devs" but like, as you said, it's devs that give their free time and energy into developing the project. Users honestly ought to respect that a lot more

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You know what's funny? Conservation of energy isn't true on a universal scale in our universe in the first place. The expansion of our universe over time actually breaks that symmetry. This is why light can get redshifted over travelling long distances. It loses energy into.. nothing

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

I mean, backwards time travel goes against our current understanding of physics. But multiple dimensions, or the many-worlds interpretation, etc, are not incompatible with our current understanding of physics, no, it's just presently an untestable hypothesis

The dissonance of "not allowed to advocate for violence", while at the same time, not only hosting combat footage, but also it being perfectly allowed to advocate for war or military operations, or talk about how "x country needs to shoot y enemy in this war" or similar, never ceases to amaze me. I literally don't get it. What is war if not exactly that?

But I guess, if it's state-sanctioned it's perfectly fine. Even if, either way, it still results in violence and people dying. Just sucks that you can't say that a war criminal deserves to die. Fucking double standards

view more: ‹ prev next ›