SpaceCowboy

joined 1 year ago
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah it's really lame... seems like the ban is permanent, so I went ahead and blocked lemmy.ml. No point in seeing content from communities that some self-righteous admin decided I shouldn't be allowed to interact with.

It is what it is. I already left reddit because of their bullshit owners. There's still way better communities on reddit than on lemmy.ml, and as bullshit as the owners of reddit are, they're still not as bad as the owners of lemmy.ml. So if it were really an issue to me I'd just go back to reddit. But it's fun to discuss things in smaller communities so I'll stick with lemmy, just not lemmy.ml.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Now you're talking about CEOs as a nebulous they.

I'm talking about a CEO that said things similar to what an amazon exec said under an article about what that amazon exec said.

Also I work in software development. There has been a clear uptick in negativity towards developers where I work, which happens to be in a similar field to the one in the article.

I've also worked with AWS, and I can tell you for sure, they can't afford to lose their best talent. Their system is pretty janky in many places and their boss should be putting more effort in making better software instead of playing games about forcing people to sit in a specific chair 5 days per week.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

The CEO of Zoom explictily stated that he felt in zoom meetings people were being too "friendly" and not willing to have "debate".

Why would it be bad for employees to be friendly? What employees want to have unfriendly debates in meetings? I think it's just managers that want that. What kind of "debate" do managers want? Why do they not want meetings to be "friendly"? Methinks they just want to yell at employees and don't feel comfortable doing it in zoom meetings for some reason...

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 weeks ago

The point isn't to get the trans vote. Like you say it's kinda a no brainer for trans people to vote for anyone running against a transphobic guy.

The point is to put out a rational response to what Trump is doing. Explain to people that might be worried about trans people that it's just a tactic meant to distract people from the real issues.

So get people to be less scared of trans people so they'll focus on actual issues and vote Dem.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 33 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

lemmy.ml tends to have an immature userbase with immature mods. It's a weird bubble of insane extremists that are all about ideological purity tests. They aren't really interested in discussion and will ban anyone that doesn't conform to their extremism. And their extremists are constantly edging towards stochastic terrorism.

So needless to say, I'm banned from lemmy.ml, and I feel like that's a badge of honour. But that does mean I won't be engaging with any community that's hosted on lemmy.ml.

So if you want to have discussion that's not about how super awesome the violent overthrow of the government of your country would be, I'd recommend not hosting your community on lemmy.ml.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago

The death rate has already gone way down as Israel shifted from assault to low intensity warfare in Gaza. Look at these numbers from the UN in June: https://www.ochaopt.org/content/reported-impact-snapshot-gaza-strip-19-june-2024

Notice the curve flattening? According to Al Jazeera the death toll is at 42,500 now. So 5 months to get to 30K (assault phase). Then 7 months to get from 30K to ~43K (low intensity phase). So it's a rate of less than 2K per month now. At the present rate, the Israel-Hamas war would have to go on for over 23 years to get to the level of casualties from the Syrian civil war.

Yahya Sinwar was just killed because he had to go above ground with only two guards. Do you really think Hamas is going to hold out for 23 years? Come on, you're smarter than this.

Sorry but the numbers just don't fit the genocide narrative that people here can't let go of. If you're starting from genocide being the absolute truth, then you're incentivized to ignore a lot of facts and start saying things that don't make a lot of sense to conform to a narrative.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago

Are we really being upset about a line moving up a couple of pixels when we're talking about polling on Trump? The polls have never been accurate on Trump and besides that there really isn't really a model for a convicted felon that tried to overthrow democracy running in a Presidential election. Nobody will know what the numbers are until the votes are counted.

No matter what the polls say it doesn't change what needs to be done. Vote. Support the Harris campaign in whatever way you're able to. If Trump was polling at 60% or if he was polling at 30% it wouldn't change what needs to be done.

Vote.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago

The comment you replied to is also an example of free speech. I see it made you a little butt-hurt that this guy isn't interested in what you have to say. But that's the nature of free speech, you can say what you want, but others a free to think you're a waste of time.

Perhaps if someone isn't interested in what you have to say, you shouldn't bother replying to them.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Biden said that Obama was asking for too much and could risk Israel stop listening to the US.

So in your version of events, was Biden right that Israel would stop listening to the US? Like is Israel not listening to the US because Biden was unable to convince Obama? Or are you saying Israel does listen to the US and Biden is making Netanyahu do things he doesn't really want to do?

Really not sure what your point is here.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

holds up spork

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

Mine love it out there.

The trick is to bring them inside before it gets cold.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Most people aren't all that well informed and don't do a lot of crtical thinking about their political positions on things. Many people are only guided by their emotions.

If your Church says that life begins at conception, then abortion is killing babies. So you'd be angry about abortions happening.

If you hear a horrible crime, you're angry about that and might want the person that did that crime to be executed. If you never hear about or think about innocent people being execute, never consider the ethical problems with a government killing people, never consider the costs of it, and all the other arguments against the death penalty, then you can go through life thinking there's no problem with it.

And even if you hear the rational arguments, they get overpowered by emotion the next time someone says "abortion is murder" or you hear about a horrible crime happening that might qualify for the death penalty.

view more: ‹ prev next ›