Studio_Xperience

joined 10 months ago
[–] Studio_Xperience@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Inexperienced ppl steer you the wrong way. If you want to learn you do workshops. That's it. If you want critique you submit to an actual contest with people who are 100% masters in their field. Not the average Joe who knows 3 basic things and 7 wrong and acts smart. And again I didn't said that ppl sharing photography annoy me. Ppl starting out have more fantasy than ppl who have tried it all and know what works. What annoys me is lazy ppl who post "what is Kelvin".

[–] Studio_Xperience@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Never said that. Don't be so defensive without reason. I said when they ask the same old question that can be answered directly from google far more reliably with guides that will solve every single question. Perhaps comprehend the statement before commenting.

[–] Studio_Xperience@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Novice photographers who post on Reddit instead of a 5min google search.

[–] Studio_Xperience@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

People pixel pipping.

[–] Studio_Xperience@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Generally yeah, in your case no. If the logo is small and fairly easy to remove he might not charge you at all.

Most people use free filters that suck (my paid luts cost 400$) and ruin the vision of the photographer, then tag them. They don't even have the decency to say they are the ones who ruin the photo when someone says it looks bad and that way the photographer looks bad. A photographer is an artist, who applies the art for you, it's like you order a painting and then paint over it. Sounds mad isnt it? Well it's exacrly like that.

[–] Studio_Xperience@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I bet they had a picture of the hair and it was mentioned in the details.