TheHarpyEagle

joined 2 months ago
[–] TheHarpyEagle@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yossarian is kind of a whiny bitch, but it's because he's trying to cover up his exhaustion and terror with anything that will keep him out of harm's way. What I liked about it was all of the silly jokes that come back to hit hard in the second half of the book.

[–] TheHarpyEagle@pawb.social 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Oh hey, I'm reading The Martian right now! Also loved Project Hail Mary by the same author, Andy Weir. It's a bit more fantastical and just a great read.

[–] TheHarpyEagle@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago

??? I was explaining the rationale behind reclaiming slurs while making them still exclusive to the targeted group.

[–] TheHarpyEagle@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The most compelling case I've seen for keeping them is to protect against exploitation and commodification. For example, there's a long history of AAVE/BVE words and phrases that have been considered vulgar and uneducated until co-opted by white communities. "Woke" is a particularly topical example: A word meant to evoke unity and self-awareness in the black community has been co-opted by (mostly) white conservatives to rally against progressive and inclusive policies. Reclaiming the n-word means using its taboo nature as a shield, saying "this is our word, and you can't have it." You can't go on the campaign trail and complain about n*ggers, but you also can't forget where it came from and what it meant. It's a living word that carries its history forward into the modern age so we don't forget the crimes of the past.

I've likewise seen use of the f-slur as a rebellion against rainbow capitalism. Companies will take pride flags and symbols and words and sell them on t-shirts and use them in commercials. These are things that were all made with intention and symbolism by the queer* community and flown in the face of danger, but companies really don't give a shit about that because well-meaning people will give them their money to support a cause. Come July first, though, do you see them selling that merch, donating to LGBTQ+ causes, or supporting their queer employees? Of course not, if anything that all gets thrown under the bus for whatever financial issue the company is having. The f-slur is again saying "this is our word, and you can't have it." It's often used jokingly or even affectionately by the queer community, but you're not going to see it printed on a mass produced shirt or said in an ad. It belongs to them and them only, maintaining the history of its creation and reclamation without being diluted by commodification.

It's also important to remember that the words have not lost their sting for many people, especially those who still often hear it said with malice towards the targeted group. We should acknowledge they they are not at a point where they cannot hear the word without those strong, negative feelings, and we can do so by respecting requests not to use it in certain spaces and calling out others who are not as sensitive.

  • As a side note, "queer" is a slur that is slowly working its way back into common parlance. It may be that these other slurs go that way eventually, though it'll take longer for some of the more severe ones.
[–] TheHarpyEagle@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago

The road to mitigating climate change and pollution will be filled with small inconveniences. In the grand scheme of things, is it really that big of a deal to spend a few cents on bags that are much more likely to end up properly disposed of to reduce the outsized amount of plastic bag litter and energy/oil spent on creating said bags?

[–] TheHarpyEagle@pawb.social 4 points 1 month ago

One possible suggestion, is it possible for you to get a reusable collapsing basket to keep downstairs for carrying groceries?

[–] TheHarpyEagle@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago

Don't you understand that those meanies are taking pictures of them while they're trying to pepper spray protestors in peace?

[–] TheHarpyEagle@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago

instead of simply being a friendly and polite contributor to society.

Do you think allistic people are inherently incapable of doing this earnestly?

[–] TheHarpyEagle@pawb.social 33 points 1 month ago (9 children)

I mean... yeah this clearly sucks ass, but as a silver lining, maybe it'll rebuild interest in nuclear.

[–] TheHarpyEagle@pawb.social 4 points 1 month ago

This is so wholesome

[–] TheHarpyEagle@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, we've seen already that AI companies are forced to be reactive when people exploit loopholes in their models or some unexpected behavior occurs. Not that they aren't smart people, but these things are very hard to predict, and hard to fix once they go wrong.

Also, what do you mean by synthetic data? If it's made by AI, that's how collapse happens.

The problem with curated data is that you have to, well, curate it, and that's hard to do at scale. No longer do we have a few decades' worth of unpoisoned data to work with; the only way to guarantee training data isn't from its own model is to make it yourself

view more: next ›