This person's works also include Burn the Bread Book, an anti-Anarcho-Communist screed in which they advocate for the end of civilization, and return to each person producing all their own food, an idea that is openly ecofascist and would kill billions, first and foremost a large number of disabled and chronically ill people.
I think you should carefully consider where your ideas are coming from.
The USSR was also destroyed by encirclement and (nearly 100 years) of pressure from reactionaries.
But again, you and and the people on the comm you named after yourself are the ones hypocritically positing that any socialist project that fails is evidence that that project's ideology inevitably leads to capitalist takeover. None of the "tankies" on Hexbear are saying that because it's asinine, but if you actually believe it, to be ideologically consistent, would require condemning anarchism also.
red fash
Deeply unserious
just a form of ideologically flavored ad hominem?
Ridiculous statement for someone who incessantly calls the most predominant socialist tendency on earth a "religion."
Edit: also lmao poli sci and economics degree
"Excuse me, the only real socialists are people with professional level liberal ideological education"
anarchism as fascism is?
I think your reading comprehension is poor, or you're referring to something outside of this thread. This is definitely not allowed in Hexbear.
Horrible line of reasoning. Anarchist projects have all reverted to capitalism much faster than the Soviet Union did.
The way you liberals need to define ideologies the US government taught you to hate as "religions" is pretty interesting to me.
Perfect was never the line, the line was just "not genocidal" and if your preferred Nazis couldn't meet that standard it's their fault and yours for letting them think they could get away with it and still maybe win.
I actually loved this one, although the product placement was off the wall
Then we happy apple photograph just switch back to normal speech laptop table tennis eye
You don't think perhaps it was the word "utopian," a word which in the discussion of various different socialist tendencies generally refers to the Utopian Socialists, a group that Marx vocally criticized?