Urist

joined 1 year ago
[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Ah, the proudest of leftist traditions: Disagreeing with other leftists. Serves us right for not being brain-dead reactionaries. Can't spell critical thinking without the C, I and A.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

They do have a working class, but your second point is all too true, which is why it has made no impact.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you say so, daddy 🤠

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Individual incidents of sexual and gender-based violence are horrible, but not nearly the same as sexual violence employed on scale through genocidal concentration camps, which is claimed by US propaganda machines. Individual incidents of sexual violence unfortunately happen everywhere, and pretending otherwise is wilful ignorance of an endemic problem for the purpose of, what I have to assume is, an underlying agenda. Stop moving the goal post and stop using reductive argumentation to score cheap shots at China. If China really is as bad as claimed, which I am not categorically refuting, then make the proper case for it.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

No, but I am not the one making statements. I only asked for sources that supported those made by others.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Yes. Though serious human rights violations are not the same as genocide and concentrations camps, as both the above poster and Victims of Communism Foundation wants us to believe.

That means in no way that those violations are acceptable.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 weeks ago

We need to ban spoons because they are nazi pedophiles' preferred tool for eating soup.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I thought it was Morgoth, a valar and not an elf, who made them. In any case it twists the causal relationship because the goblins subsequently make their own pitiful conditions. I do not condone the terminology even if solely on the basis of how reductionist it is. Since a government is, in its pure form, only a body of people, you can translate trust between people and trust between a government if it is sufficiently representative.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Okay, so I never wanted to say that this was unique to Scandinavia. The important part was how we have a a lot of trust based systems (which of course probably exists elsewhere too, but not everywhere) that are really formative for how we make policy and implement it.

This trust should translate to trust to other people, but this has been eroded away for some time because the social contract is being violated.

Most importantly with respect to elf/goblin part: I found that distasteful and resent the implication that I said anything to that degree. I do not think people are fundamentally different, only that the conditions (material basis and social superstructures) that they find themselves in allow for and promotes certain kinds of actions and ways of being.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Could be I am being dense, but I do not understand what you are saying at all.

 

The bourgeoisie in my country have pushed the euphemism of "working capital" as something that needs protection from wealth tax. By inseparably connecting capital with jobs, they push the narrative that you cannot tax wealth without removing jobs and consequently hurting the working class. They paid for research groups to prove this connection, but what their research actually showed was that wealth tax creates jobs due to incentivizing keeping profits within the companies they own. The audacity to think owning the means of production is a privilege they should enjoy special treatment to keep is beyond me, but even so, this type of rhetoric keeps gaining ground.

What is the propaganda they are pushing on you, and how can socialist policies prevail if reason loses to made up words changing the narrative?

view more: next ›