VelociCatTurd

joined 1 year ago
[–] VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Save your money and just buy Hades, it’s fantastic.

[–] VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The machinist has this same vibe imo.

[–] VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I would’ve if I was wrong

[–] VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

If you really think someone is wrong don’t ask them “why, why, why” incessantly like a toddler, grow a pair of balls and just speak your mind.

And in this case I meant “your IP” as in, the grand scheme of things “an IP address that you own”, a VPS for instance, not necessarily the destination. Obviously you wouldn’t need to tell a firewall what its own public IP is. Have I clarified my thought to your standards?

[–] VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (4 children)

No fucking shit? In that scenario your friend could use DDNS and you point your access rule to his FQDN to allow access.

Did you really ask me a billion fucking “why” questions just to come back and fucking what prove me wrong? Is this a good use of your time? I literally thought you were a noobie looking to understand.

Fuck off.

[–] VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (6 children)

An access rule for instance. To say to allow all traffic or specific types of traffic from a public IP address. This could be if you wanted to allow access to some media server from your friends house or something.

[–] VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (8 children)

If OP needs a firewall rule to do any number of things that a firewall does.

[–] VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (10 children)

Because you’re not going to setup any rules pointed to a dynamic public IP address. Otherwise you’re going to be finding a way to change the rule every time the ip changes.

The ddns automatically updates an A record with your public IP address any time it changes, so yeah the rules would use the fqdn for that A record.

[–] VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (12 children)

To resolve whatever hostname you’ve setup for ddns

[–] VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (14 children)

As long as whatever firewall rules you’re using is capable of resolving FQDNs then I don’t see an advantage of doing this. Maybe in the off chance that your IP changes, someone else gets the old IP and exploits it before the DDNS setup has a chance to update. I think that’s really unlikely.

Edit: just to add to this, I do think static IPs are preferable to DDNS, just because it’s easier, but they also typically cost money.

[–] VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’m being facetious but the amount of apps between the chromecast and Roku is enormous. I’m sure it has most major apps, but as soon as I plugged it in and it didn’t even have an emby app, it went straight back to the store. Just relies way too much on casting, which I understand like any app can do but I don’t like that.

2
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world to c/steamdeck@lemmy.ml
 

I’ve been streaming games from my big boy PC to the deck for a few weeks now. Everything so far had streamed pretty well, but streaming Ratchet and Clank, it just runs like ass? It runs perfectly fine on the PC when not streaming. I stream Miles Morales and it plays great, so I’m not sure what it is and looking to see if anyone else has run into the same thing.

Edit: in case anyone sees this in the future. The answer was to disable hard decoding on the deck.

view more: next ›