Rsync is what you're after, especially if you're moving large files. I regularly transfer hundreds of gb using rsync and it's great.
Selfhosted
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil.
-
No spam.
-
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
-
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
-
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
Rsync or Rclone.
My understanding of rsync was that it was pretty painfully slow.
I use rsync for this purpose and the only notable bottleneck is my download speed, fwiw.
I don't know if this applies to you, but don't use the compression flag (-z) for files that already is compressed (like video). The transfer will get CPU bound quickly if you have a fast internet connection.
I went from 13 Mbytes/s to 200 by removing the -z flag, and the compression ratio was non-existant anyway.
The only time rsync is really slow is when your dealing with millions of small files since it only transfers a single file at a time.
rclone is better in that respect since it transfers multiple files in parallel. I don't think the speed of a single transfer is going to differ much.
That must have been it, appreciate the clarification.
I'm very happy with Syncthing, you can configure how you want the sync to work (e.g. one-way sync, two-way sync, etc.), the web GUI is pretty good and it's not that hard to set up. I got the idea from this video back when I initially set up my seedbox, have been using this solution ever since and encountered any issues.
I've used it in the past, but they are deprecating one-way ignore-delete syncing.
Do you have a source for that? I’m using syncthing for this exact purpose.
An explanation from one of the maintainers explaining why they removed the toggle from the UI and try to hide it from users because it's going to be deprecated eventually:
Thanks! I didn't find this when searching. Guess I’ll be searching for another solution for my setup.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.