In the same sense that chlamydia is much better than syphilis.
WatDabney
joined 2 years ago
No matter where you go, there you are.
Emulated on a PC.
In about '98, I discovered SNES9x. I had an SNES hooked up to my TV at the time, but as soon as I discovered how convenient it was to play on a PC instead, I just stopped using it and eventually boxed it up and put it away. And I haven't looked back.
And it's been renamed the Presidential Medal of Trump.
And if you ACT NOW! you too can own this commemorative solid GOLD^1 replica medal complete with a CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY personally signed by PRESIDENT TRUMP^2 for just FOUR easy installments of $599.95. THAT'S RIGHT - for just five easy installments of $699.95, you too can own this beautiful piece of history commemorating the bestset president EVER! So send in your six payments of $799.95 NOW!
1- colored
2- 's autopen
Huh...
This might just be an exceedingly rare instance in which those corrupt and compromised conservative fuckheads on the Supreme Court won't just rubber-stamp whatever Trump wants, since pissing off the Fed, and the entire banking/investing industry whose interests it represents, could be even worse for them than pissing off the Toddler-in-chief.
How odd that a single policy document okayed white supremacism, false medical information and pedophilia.
It's almost as if the three are all somehow interrelated - like they're all promoted by and for the same people.
🤔
Wall Street is concerned about the reliability of government inflation data on the eve of CPI report
As well they should be.
Trump has already made it clear that his opinion of the accuracy of economic statistics depends solely on whether they reflect well or poorly on him.
So it's pretty well guaranteed that the primary requirement of any future statistics will be that they reflect well on him, and accuracy and veracity will be somewhere further down the list.
Entirely predictable.
Every single time that a Republican administration purports to be cracking down on "wasteful spending," you can be sure of two things: that their definition of "wasteful spending" is "any spending that benefits anyone other than ourselves and our cronies and patrons," and that all they're really going to do is shift it so that it exclusively does benefit themselves and their cronies and patrons.
It's starting to feel a bit Pol Pot in here....
I would assume their totals aren't going to change much but thry'll lose some number of users from the UK and gain a more or less equal number of users from a seemingly random snd ever-changing assortment of other countries.
As far as genre statistics and the like go, I wouldn't expect them to change other than as they generally do, just as tastes and trends change.
view more: next ›
No
Really, he's barely even a person at all. Mostly he's just a vehicle for his massive ego.
Shapiro is one of the best examples (alongside Paul Krugman until he recently went rogue) of what I think of as an unconscious volunteer tool.
That is to say, I don't think he consistently spews rhetoric that benefits the oligarchs as some sort of deliberately self-serving scheme (as opposed to for instance Jesse Watters).
I think he spews rhetoric consistently beneficial to the oligarchs because some among the oligarchy told him how much of a genius he was when he first started spewing it, and now his ego won't allow him to do anything else, no matter the bizarre quasi-logical contortions he has to go through.