WatDabney

joined 2 years ago
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 44 points 5 months ago

Surely now at least some few of the people in authority who have ignored Trump's grossly obvious unfitness for office will do something, right?

Right?

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 16 points 5 months ago

Then next up is to finish criminalizing homelessness so that those people (and many more) can be converted into slaves to the new generation of robber barons.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 14 points 5 months ago

Of course, what she actually means is that people have been brainwashed in a somewhat different way than she would've preferred, but at least she's right about the brainwashing part. Since she's incapable of self-reflection, that's not going to mean anything to her or change anything for her, but still... for someone as willfully and angrily ignorant as she is, that's almost sort of impressive.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 12 points 5 months ago

This illustrates one of the many oddities about Trump.

With any other president, we had policy debates and stated goals and decisions made and implemented.

With Trump, we just have this string of essentially arbitrary threats, promises and rhetoric, and alongside that is a string of essentially arbitrary policies arbitrarily enacted and rescinded and followed and ignored, and there's no necessary correlations between any of it.

It's another of the things that I think Trump does simply because he's a delusional toxic narcissist, a genuinely stupid person, and emotionally a toddler, and another of the things that the would-be autocrats - the billionaires and the CEOs and the religious right and the Republicans and the rest of the greedy and power-hungry scum - take advantage of him doing.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 172 points 5 months ago (12 children)

his chances of raising money and looking like a leader

Note that raising money is the first thing mentioned.

And note that winning elections isn't mentioned at all.

Which neatly sums up what's wrong with the DNC.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 47 points 5 months ago (3 children)

With any luck, it will kill google.

I don't see how they can even pretend that it will do anything other than steal website traffic, since the exact point is to provide you with the information you would have gotten if you had gone to the website, leaving no reason to actually go to the website.

So painfully obviously, Google intends to steal the websites' content in order to steal the websites' traffic.

Which would seem to me to be grounds for class action lawsuits on behalf of the entire internet, which, if judged fairly, should bankrupt even that foul beast of a corporation.

And ironically enough, that would almost certainly "rejuvenate the internet." As a matter of fact, I can't think of a single thing that would do more to "rejuvenate the internet" than killing Google.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 months ago

Because tyrants have a shared interest in not normalizing the killing of tyrants.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 12 points 5 months ago

There are a number of conservatives who straddle a line such that I can't be sure if they're genuinely stupid or if they're just cultivating that image.

Tuberville isn't one of them though.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 27 points 5 months ago

But the Trump administration is refusing to reassure them they won’t be subject to retaliation.

That would be because they will be subject to retaliation.

Trump is nothing if not petty and vindictive, and as with all the rest of his many and profound flaws and failures, he's molding the rest of the government into his gross and detestable image.

And as with the rest of his brazen assaults on legal and ethical standards, nobody with any authority will do a single fucking thing about it.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 26 points 6 months ago

I don't see how it could make any difference.

He's already an idiot, a delusional narcissist, and a compulsive liar, so it's not as if he could become even more detached from realitybthan he already is. And his supporters don't care (and likely don't even notice), since they're even dumber than he is.

And it's not like he"s going to forget his platform, since it's pretty much just hating immigrants and LGBTQ, dicking over poor people, singing his own praises and scamming as much money as possible, and that's all as natural and automatic to him as breathing..

Really, there's just not much cognition going on there in the first place - it's more in the nature of infantile immediacy and animal instincts - so I can't see how any loss of it would matter much.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 months ago

Yow.

Do you genuinely not realize that you just wrote an entire post methodically proving that my analysis of the situation is correct?

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

My idea of progressivism is something that leads to peace, not backing stupid theocrats that spread violence wherever they go.

If this was true you'd be condemning Israel as well.

It appears to me that your problem is that you're viewing it entirely binaristically.

You're accusimg the leftists who condemn Israel of being pro-Palestine, when that's actually two separate issues, and it's in fact quite easy to condemn the patently evil oppression and slaughter of innocents without supporting the government under which they live.

And at the same time, in your rush to opposevthe undeniable toxicity of Islamic fundamentalism, you're ignoring or excusing the laundry list of atrocities in which Israel engages on a literally daily basis.

If you had the working brain you claim to have, you'd be able to make the small stretch to condemning both Islamic oppression and Zionist oppression, instead of ignorantly treating it as an all or nothing prospect in which opposition to one requires support for the other.

view more: ‹ prev next ›