Traffic from certain targeted users was selectively redirected to attacker-controlled malicious update manifests.
I don't want to sound dismissive, but at the same time, if you're wondering, "Does this affect me and my computer?" the answer is almost certainly "no." It's scary anyway.
I would have guessed NPP had an option to disable check-for-updates every time it starts, but I couldn't find one.
...the Department of Homeland Security brought its allegations to the public long before it could be tested in court, repeating claims of bounties up to $50,000.
So the DHS just wants everyone to be informed about some exciting new gig economy opportunities?
Sure, it may not work, because the feds haven't been following the rules. It's important to make it crystal-clear that they aren't following the rules, anyway.
Back in the Naughties, I thought this approach would matter, would rein in police abuse.
I didn't understand that police violence and mendacity were systemic, cultural problems, not evidentiary ones.
It's the Culture of Life(TM)
At this point, the greatest insult the president can offer is to fail to threaten a lawsuit, honestly.
If CBP and ICE were really on a mission to find non-citizens, they wouldn't have been sent to fucking Minnesota .
Even a die-hard "kick 'em all out" pro-crackdown MAGA shithead should be angry about what is actually happening on the ground.
The articles under the "anti-fake" heading seem to mostly be about illuminating and countering Russian propaganda efforts, Russian disinformation campaigns, Russian media subversion, etc.
"Anti-fake" is a term that has apparently been applied to official legislative efforts to counter propaganda, disinfo, and media subversion around the world. I hadn't heard the term before, but I'm not seeing anything inherently suspect about it, under the circumstances.
Maybe it's just an appropriate response to the times.
Can you expand on this? What does "anti-fake" mean to you, what does it mean to them? Is this something a lot of news outlets have? Is this the only one? I've never heard of this and I'm confused.
Something that jumped out at me: These guys had worked for CBP for ~8 and ~12 years, respectively.
These thugs, who wrestled an uninvolved bystander to the ground, then shot him in the back while he lay there helpless, were not panicky newbs. These were veteran CBP officers.
Is this just what veteran CBP officers are like?
Conservatives' whole deal can be summarized as "picking and choosing who gets to have rights."
It's not as if ICE is going to stop kidnapping people if they run out of lawyers.
Staying on and trying to make the system work sounds like the most moral option to me. It also sounds fruitless.