Wolf314159

These are also pretty good at shielding you from biting insects and fascist police state spy cameras.

It's got the juice!

Projecting much? I don't see any of that shit in OP's photo. Maybe talk to your therapist about why a children's toy triggers such intrusive homoerotic and beastial thoughts in yourself. This is not a healthy reaction to a child's toy.

1. You're bad a being a troll.
2. Googling it doesn't actually produce an answer that makes any fucking sense of this "joke".
3. Same energy as those idiots that answer "I don't know" when Amazon asks them to help review a product.

Why immediately shame the guys choosing the unicorn as the weird guys? And add in a little homophobia to boot? That is exactly the problem with defining gender stereotypes based on sex at birth. There is absolutely nothing wrong with a boy wanting to dig a terrifying and deadly fae creature with a fucking sword on its face from the heart of a dead giant. There is also nothing wrong with a boy wanting to dig a majestic pony from out of a pink heart shaped cocoon.

You're the one perverting this into something about grown men having fantasies about fucking horses. We all know bronies exist and their tastes may not be for everyone, but that's a poor excuse for this brand of cringe hate mongering.

Calling a Ruby Tuesday's a restaurant is kind of like me calling myself a carpenter because I've assembled a few pieces of Ikea furniture. It's basically sit down fast food with a liquor license.

Another one for the Plex/Jellyfin collection.

I have 2 editions of The Gunslinger because Stephen King revised some parts to fit better with the remaining novels. The Gunslinger is a very early work and it shows. I've read the first 3 books of the dark tower series at least twice. Last time through the series, after King "completed" it, I started with the original The Gunslinger and ended the series with the revised edition. The differences are relatively minor and, although I am generally a fan of his, I prefer the rough edges of the original. Reading the original first and the revised edition last felt more like a conclusion and coming full circle than the final book ever could have. Despite the differences, they still feel like the same book to me.

No. It's a film adaptation of a short story that appears to basically be romantasy pinnochio fan fic.

Lol, you totally missed the point.

We don't just tell stories, we repeat stories and re-tell stories. It's been happening since before literature or the stage even existed. Even the Odyssey wasn't an entirely original story. Our very first records of literature are literally stories that were told and re-told and re-told and refined and reformed and re-told for generations. Re-telling stories is a fundamental thing common to practically every human. It's what we do and what we are. It's not the end of the world, it's just the mortar that binds our individual experiences into civilization. You don't need to weep, you just need more art and literature in your life, maybe fewer headlines about movies for toddlers.

If you're bored with a story you've seen before, there's a good chance it wasn't made for you, let the people it was made for have it. I think I can safely say that the next Airbud movie wasn't made for you or anyone here. I'm okay letting the kids have their Airbud movie without being snarky about it.