aasatru

There are experts around here.

Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State and Utopia is a solid philosophical foundation for a lot of right wing thought. If you want to engage further you can follow up with Michael Otsuka's critique in Self-Ownership and Equality: A Lockean Reconciliation.

Nozick provides an underpinning for what many think of as traditional conservative American values, without basing it in Christianity.

Then of course there's the Chicago school of economics (Friedman et al), which is just a somewhat naive and more it less completely discredited take on how the economy works. It's fundamental for understanding American politics the previous half century, but their ideas are not really worth interacting with unless you're particularly interested in economics. It's not like the idiot politicians who push it in front of them understand the theories either.

Thsee theories is not far right; there's no salvaging the far right, and their ideological basis is mostly just bigotry. You could read Ayn Rand to try to understand which hole these idiots crawled from. Or better, don't waste your time.

I guess technically that's neither romance nor a scam. Still messed up in more ways than one.

I have posted some pictures I've taken from hikes, and check in now and then when I feel like posting something or looking at pictures.

My experience is very different from what other people here seem to report. I am just posting into the void, I have posted 11 pictures to date, and I never linked the account to anything or told anyone about it. Still I have more than 50 followers, only from people who stumbled over my content and decided to follow. I'm only following half of that number, so it's not a politeness thing.

I've also gotten a few comments, though mostly people just click like and/or boost. It seems every time I post something I gain at least a follower or two.

So overall I'm pretty impressed by PixlFed. If you have something to share it's a good platform to do so. And there's nice landscape photography on there, at least.

It's an indoor plant, so I guess finding it's way out of the apartment would be the challenge.

oh no

Careful, you might attract the Shrek cult

PieFed is also a nice project, though it doesn't do microblogging so it's more of a Lemmy alternative.

I guess the whole point here is that people come from different platforms - I'm not sure it makes too much sense to include the platform in the community name at all. General names like 'AskFedi' or AskAround' would make a lot more sense in my book. I don't really care all that much which software a community is hosted on.

Not very high brow, but this happens a lot in good children's movies, with adults laughing at moments when the kids don't understand why. My favourite is in Shrek when he's walking across an onion field trying to contemplate how troll are like onions, but gets constantly interrupted by Donkey.

In Peer Gynt, the protagonist picks up an onion after having considered marrying into a family of trolls. He starts out by comparing himself to the onion, exactly like Shrek, in that he has multiple layers. However, as he's not being interrupted by Donkey, Gynt keeps removing layers until he realizes there's no core - the onion, like himself, is just a bunch of thin layers with no real central identity or reason to exist.

Shrek never gets to make this realisation, because Donkey keeps insisting nobody likes onions: he would be better off comparing himself to a parfait, as they also have multiple layers.

What's a bit of a turning point of self-insight in the beginning of Peer Gynt is ruined by Donkey in Shrek, rendering it instead a commentary on how everybody loves perfait.

Also it's a bigger market of lawyers, so probably easier and cheaper to get high quality legal help against bullshit like this.

I think it is a pretty major issue. A single-user instance shouldn't need more than 100 GB. The internet is too bloated, which is a democratic problem as well as an environmental one.

It's of some importance for the Fediverse in particular, as we want to have a system of many independent instances with low running costs and minimal environmental footprints. A bloated piece of software running on one centralized server is different from it running on thousands of decentralized ones, and higher running costs means that instances are more likely to disappear rendering the network more fragile.

Of course it's not the biggest problem out there, but I think it's important enough that it should be a priority.

They should have been giving their money to Bridgy Fed, which is working to bridge the actual content of social media rather than the app APIs.

Well, actually, I would much rather Bridgy remains independent from Dorsey's blood money. Bluesky should just enable federation on a large scale so that it'll actually be possible to build services around it. Right now they cap federated instances at ten users, which is a complete joke.