alphanerd4

joined 8 months ago
[–] alphanerd4@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

if I leave it there. It’s because it’s not foul enough to warrant a ban but I don’t want to press a little green check box explicitly endorsing its existence. I have been here the whole time :/ Yal couped me

 
[–] alphanerd4@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Oh yea fuck Jorking rorlkiling Rowling

 

Transcription via user I CAST FIST

Quoting the text for easier read to everyone:

The desire to exclusively engage with media and art made by "unproblematic" artists is a direct result of Americans viewing media consumption as an inherently political act because that is the supreme promise of Western prosperity and the religion of consumerism, and that's because it's seemingly all that's left. We've been stripped and socialized out of any real political energy and agency. Our ability to consume is the only thing remaining that's "ours" in late capitalism, and as a result it's become a stand-in for (or perhaps the sole defining quality of) every aspect of being alive today - consuming is activism, it's love, it's thinking, it's sex, it's fill in the blank. When the act of consuming is all you have left and indeed the only thing society tells you is valuable and meaningful, the act must necessarily be a moral one, which is why people send themselves down manic spirals deciding what, who is "problematic" or not, because for us the stakes are that high now.

[–] alphanerd4@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

🤷‍♂️ could be a specific thing they told me n I forgot. Maybe as simple as don’t post lemmy screenshots trying to be funny. Idrc I used to be really into that community and got back into theory about it. I had like 100k karma , maybe less maybe way more , basically every post I’d put on that sub that got really big got taken down over the last year or so. I can’t speak to why mine specifically, but so far as I can tell they straight up Went through with like their definitive rules for posts or whatever and applied it retroactively and purged basically the whole top posts page halfba dozen times over at least. Maybe I’m just last to the party but the vague rumblings about how the main sub remains borked are well founded.

[–] alphanerd4@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I mean, they didn’t do anything wrong. I just don’t like the rule(s) that I’m violating.

 

What’s up the phrasing on that headline

[–] alphanerd4@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

If it makes you feel any better it’s like 70% just me. Don’t feel too good tho b/c I am here owing to police beatings and being held in solitary confinement. So. Yeah 👍

0
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by alphanerd4@lemmy.world to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
 

Update : I am permanently banned from the r/boringdystopia subreddit becaUse TheY wArNEd m MuLtIPlE TiMeS

Okay so I would give you a link, but here’s why I’m not: self promotion-always gota be careful with that. 2 there is actually a school of thought that says a few people looking something up is as good if not better than several people clicking a link.-especially considering the not insignificant overlap there is between our communities just by the nature of the thing.

M yes and Lemmy links. How do they even work. I don’t know :D

Oh and our spots are #16 and #17 , for Lemmy.World , sorted by monthly activity . Is p cool. On Reddit we may not see eye to eye but on here we do be having tippy toes 😅

 

OK, so granted it’s not necessarily cool. It is just a normal link. But like seriously you know it’s it’s always an option to professionalize the research aspect.

[–] alphanerd4@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Okay, so this is actually really interesting. It gets into how in the US, when we talk about slavery, we are specifically talking about chattel slavery as it was practiced in the Americas. And there’s actually a pretty strong argument that American chattel slavery is, if not unique in world history, it is more aberrant than other force labor systems throughout world history.

Absolutely mass incarceration, and the force labor system that goes along with it are incredibly distinct from American style chattel slavery, but this is because they’re arguably more in line with what slavery, distinct from chattel slavery, ‘usually’ meant. Basing a forced labor system off of race is more or less a modern phenomenon . There’s some nuance, but slave codes basically make up the core of available written records on the development of race as a cultural concept. [big ol’ FOR THE WEST label here]

24
Hey there, Peers. (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by alphanerd4@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
 

Greetings, fellow Lemmy spaces

[–] alphanerd4@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah that’s an important thing I have to address. Why do people think that authoritarianism means someone being mean to them?

Edit: I shouldn’t be that sour about it. Definitions are super important part and I’ve seen this coming for months., But there does seem to be like a rather substantive difference between like political science definitions of authoritarianism versus like general use public definitions. Like the general public seems to be really about like on an individual level, and I just don’t think that’s super helpful when you’re talking about governmental structure. there’s a little bit of overlap, but that’s not what the focus of most of the academic writing on the subject is so what pops up on Google when you just google “authoritarian“ is not the definition I’m operating off of, no.

Edit2: But yeah, oh yeah yeah yeah, the US being both a democracy and massively a fan of authoritarian governance is exactly what the memes about and you know trying to talk to anybody about that really seems to be like half of people take it as such a given like your baby for not having gotten over that when you were a kid and the other half like consider it an assault against the soul of America

 

I expect this to be common knowledge for much of the audience here, but

TLDR: Science has[is starting to] confirmed. Autistic people are a [comparatively] traumatized group.

Journal article is from January of this year.

Introduction: Children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may be particularly vulnerable to the impact of traumatic events, yet the association between ASD and the risk of developing acute stress disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) remains uncertain. This study aims to investigate this association, addressing the gap in large-scale evidence on the subject.

Methods: Conducted as a retrospective and matched cohort study, data was sourced from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) in Taiwan, spanning from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2015. The study included patients aged 18 years or under newly diagnosed with ASD (n=15,200) and compared them with a matched control group (n=45,600). The Cox proportional regression model was employed to assess the risk of acute stress disorder and PTSD.

Results: Over the 15-year follow-up period, a total of 132 participants developed either acute stress disorder or PTSD. Among them, 105 cases (0.691% or 64.90 per 100,000 person-years) were in the ASD group, while 27 cases (0.059% or 5.38 per 100,000 person-years) were in the control group. The adjusted hazard ratio for the ASD group was significantly higher compared to the control group (25.661 with 95% CI = 15.913-41.232; P < .001).

Discussion: This study provides compelling evidence that individuals with ASD face an elevated risk of developing acute stress disorder and PTSD. The findings underscore the importance of clinicians recognizing and addressing this vulnerability in ASD individuals exposed to traumatic events. This emphasizes the need for heightened attention to the risk of PTSD and acute stress disorder in the ASD population.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/14262290

Breaking News. US forces have engaged and shot down Iranian military drones.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/14246579

its 40 bipedal dinosaurs and they all look like this:

[–] alphanerd4@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

that's kind of my take on the situation, yeah.

edit: you know, it would just be rude,. to deny the president, . who is also your boss. edit2: can you imagine? 'we couldnt get anyone from your community so we're canceling the event, but we'll still do it 8D for youu'. Like whooah wooah woah il put good money that this sequence of events is not what those staffers signed up for.

[–] alphanerd4@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

To head it off: Yes, there was still "an event" at the white house to observe the holiday. Attended exclusively by white house staff. So I assume that means muslim employees of the president attended "the event".

[–] alphanerd4@lemmy.world -3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

man.,
maybe i just feel like it should be. edit: it was when i was a kid :(

view more: next ›