antonim

joined 2 years ago
[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I watched it like thrice and it only got better and more fascinating on every rewatch.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't want to sound rude, but have you actually looked at the chart?

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Umm actually ☝️🤓

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

Great question, let's dig into this! Federico Fellini's is a sequel to his previous hit film Se7en, and its protagonists are a group of eight friends. One of the friends becomes a father, and his baby counts as the "½" in the title. The group gets into various crazy adventures, such as being a failed film director, fantasising about hot women, having mommy issues, and hating religion. The overall message may be summarised as: friendship is magic.

Do you have any further questions on French New Wave films?

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s new evidence that cows are capable of what we (humans broadly) previously thought them incapable of. It’s important because it’s a concrete indicator that there’s more going on in cow brains than humans have generally assumed.

As I said, perhaps this is surprising only because we understand brains overly mechanically. As if it's assumed that there's a hard "can/can't do" switch for particular mental actions, while in reality any ability may be a result of various factors within the individual brain and outside of it aligning together (including, of course, the cow in question being a pet, so having a very comfortable lifestyle). If people can vary wildly in their mental abilities and inclinations, why wouldn't animals?

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a fair point. On the other hand, Veronika is described as a pet, which might mean she's not even being milked, and her lifestyle is perhaps more conductive to letting her experiment and learn about her environment than usual.

Still, we haven't been treated cows that horribly until relatively recently (not to say that older practices were particularly humane either), and there's probably a solid number of cows living outside of that system, so I'd still expect something like tool usage being noticed sooner than 2026. Which is of course a subjective impression, there may be other, better explanations...

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We have NO IDEA what differences make such things unique.

What do you mean by this? Make what things unique? Why do we have to understand the differences to be sure that the outcome is unique?

To pretend it is our gift alone is to be a self-centered piece of shit.

I also think you're a piece of shit, if I may respond directly to this indirect insult; now, can we get back to talking normally?

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Doesn't the fact that this is news also kind of diminish its importance? We've lived with cows for so many generations, there are millions of cows out there, and there's just one single cow that we've seen being this smart. Most of them would still count as stupid, if this is proof of intelligence.

OTOH I also get the impression this is news in part because we(?) kind of overrated the trait of using tools and doing basic planning as a sign of substantial intelligence, assuming a large technical/biological gap between being and not being able to do it. Animal brains are, I would suppose, not so hard-wired and predefined as we thought, and individual specimen can be more or less creative and smart.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It wasn’t even 400 years ago that Newton was explaining what gravity is, and 400 years is a damn blip on the evolutionary scale of a species that can live 100+ years.

But that's just further proof that we are special. In just some 5000 years we broke the nature meta countless times, and we're doing it again and again faster and faster, we're so fucking smart we're doing the Paleoproterozoic extinction ("Oxygen holocaust") all over again.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

>NFT monkey pfp

>dogshit take

Who'd have thought!

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is this loss?

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago

dem ~𝒶𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓉𝒾𝒸𝓈~ doe

 
 

In 1975, Martin met Dune author Frank Herbert at a book convention and they shared a drink. The meeting was “near the end of Herbert’s life,” Martin says. Herbert had written many acclaimed novels, but all fans seemed to want was more Dune. Herbert’s publisher had just offered him a modest advance for a story he wanted to write, or six times that number for another Dune novel.

“He didn’t like Dune anymore and he didn’t want to write any more Dune books,” Martin says. “But he felt locked in by the success of Dune, so he kept writing them.”

Martin finishes … and waits.

I ask: Do you relate to how Herbert felt?

“I’m not necessarily tired of the world [of Ice and Fire],” he says. “I love the world and the world-building. But, yes, I do.”

 
11
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/movies@piefed.social
 

Béla Tarr passed away on 6 January 2026 after a long and serious illness. We will miss him.

 

The extensive damage means that about 35,000 households will be without electricity until Thursday afternoon, Berlin authorities said in a statement. Power should be restored to other homes by early Sunday.

 
 
66
anti-jolly rule (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
 

And I mean for real, not the hex code.

 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/40687915

"Who's to know? [Technology firms] are spending trillions and trillions on AI and maybe it's going to produce the next War and Peace.

"And if people want to read that book, AI-generated or not, we will be selling it - as long as it doesn't pretend to [be] something that it isn't.

"We as booksellers would certainly naturally and instinctively disdain it," Daunt said.

Readers value a connection with the author "that does require a real person", he added. Any AI-generated book would always be clearly labelled as such.

 

(@guilhernunes_ on tw*tter)

 
view more: next ›