banana_lama

joined 6 months ago
[–] banana_lama@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

I don't disagree. But I'm pretty sure this was intended to be done on the election year. Don't get me wrong, I will not vote for the orange fuzz ball with a gun to my head. But this could've been done earlier in his term

[–] banana_lama@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thousands. There was a point in time last year or whenever where that number was 100 or 1000 or even 1.

Could've pardoned that person then.

[–] banana_lama@lemm.ee 48 points 3 months ago

Now put in a law saying you can't do that

[–] banana_lama@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago

For uploading game clips I'd assume

[–] banana_lama@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

I'm giving it to my brother. Or just sell it for $100 to yourself

[–] banana_lama@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

If someone buys a home that was rented. Would the cap apply to them? Because this might result in a loophole

[–] banana_lama@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

For us to do so yes. For the government, it constantly breaks the law

[–] banana_lama@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Funny-ly enough you can block their signal. Issue is it's also going to block everyone within range

[–] banana_lama@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

GLBTA? I honestly thought you were spelling something out with that

[–] banana_lama@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago

I understand for the life of the company. But it's not even my steam account. It's my child's who's currently -5 years old (give or take). I did create it on their behalf a decade ago to redeem the free games on their behalf and gift them games I think they'll enjoy.

[–] banana_lama@lemm.ee 90 points 3 months ago (12 children)

Oh I didn't own my steam account it was created for my future children. it's a trust.

view more: next ›