blady_blah

joined 2 years ago
[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

So I tried to think of the top three things that I really enjoy with nuts in them:

  1. Ice cream with hardening chocolate sauce and crushed peanuts sprinkled on top (sooo good)
  2. Almond Roca (toffee plus chocolate plus nuts)
  3. Whitefish with almonds on top. (I know I'm not describing this very well, but I've had several fish with nuts on top that have been truly outstanding.)
[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

"Lost in the sauce" is an old phrase, at least as long as I've been alive, where "sauce" is alcohol.

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm going to go against the grain here and agree with him. If you look at it as this being a new technology, like robotics or computers, then they will cause disruption in the workforce as people who used to do the tasks are replaced with a technology solution in it's place. That's how the tech CEOs are looking at this, as a disruptive technology that will either replace people in the workforce (tech support being replaced by AI) or make people more efficient (one programmer instead of a team).

I honestly don't think he's wrong. But just like the two technologies I mentioned above, there will be a limit to what AI can do and it will find it's disruptive nitch and then no longer be cost effective. Back in the 50's or in the 80's computers and robotics were going to drive us all out of work.... but lo and behold, we all still have jobs.

The real issue isn't AI, but how this will allow the few to capture even more wealth. AI is just a technology step, the ultra wealthy are a crime.

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's just a celebration of winter solstice. My family is as atheist as the day is long, but we still enjoy the trappings of Christmas.

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I'm sorry your bio family aren't better people. I hope you've found better quality humans to call your family.

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Excuse me for being out of the loop, but is there a path towards AI photo manipulation coming for gimp? (Or already here?). Basically doing things like generative fill and other AI editing capabilities?

(I use affinity photo for my photo editing at the moment, so it's been awhile since I've been paying attention to gimp.)

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

This is a bit of a weird question to answer because it depends a lot on context.

At its core, the purpose of life is to reproduce and guarantee your bloodline passes on to the next generations. That's kind of the heart of evolution. That's great and all but that just means we're here and we have a lot of time in between all that if we even want to follow that purpose.

Beyond that evolution purpose, I believe that the goal in life is to get as much enjoyment out of life as possible. A lot of that is based on experiences and personal growth. But the reality is that's all a personal choice. You get to make up your own purpose, and that's just one I've made up.

You do you, but life is short and we don't get a second chance.

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Holy shit. I feel like I live in a different world than everyone else who's responded to this question.

Yes, of course I love the kids who reciprocate my love more. It's one of the most endearing things about kids is when they say that I love you and provide that emotional feedback. That doesn't mean if they didn't that I wouldn't love them, but it does mean that if one or two of my three kids got distant that I would probably love them less. That doesn't mean zero, it just means less. I left all my kids in different ways based upon each of their personalities. It always fluctuates and I see it pull on my heartstrings whatever they do things that are loving and kind and giving...

I guess what I'm really saying is that I'm not 0 to 100% love, I'm talking about going from 70 to 100% or something like that. I will always love my kids, but I love them even more when they give it back.

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Honestly, no, I can't really say I have. I'm also not someone who loses my temper very easily and when I do I never start screaming or shouting.

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

In my opinion, guy friendships need to be doing something together. We don't call each other up out of a blue and talk to each other about deep things. We don't share our emotions other than on a high level or in extreme cases.

The good friends I have. I always do stuff with. I have one really good friend who I always hike with every weekend. I have another good friend group that plays video games together most nights. If you remove those people from my life, I don't have a single male friend left that I talk with more than once a year.

I always figured that's why watching and playing sports was so important to guys. It's the glue that holds male friendships together. (Or in my case, playing online video games)

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Good. I hope bad things happen to bad people.

[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

At the moment it's about racism. The goal is to make America less friendly to immigrants. They haven't started to really hit "nuisances" yet. That'll come later once this is all normalized.

 

I see CEO's as the last working person in the system. They are at least putting in the time and effort to make money. The are "the last working man/woman" in the chain up to the owners. The real travesty is the owners who get all the money without doing any actual work.

If the CEO makes less money, do you think you'd get more? The answer is no. A company will control costs and not pay employees more than they have to. Your salary has nothing to do with the CEOs salary and at least in theory you have a chance to become CEO... more of a chance than you have of becoming an owner.

The inherited wealth, the hedge funds, the owners... they get all the return. They get all the rewords. Even my boss, who started the company I work at, he makes his money by being an owner. His salary as a CEO is pennies vs his salary owning the company. The success of the company should be shared amongst the employees who made it happen, and the truth is they aren't. That's the real kick to the nuts, not the salary of the CEO.

view more: next ›